[PATCH v6 10/13] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list

From: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com,
	ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/13] KVM: selftests: Only do get/set tests on present blessed list
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:41:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <859b1f9ec108ba897de2d5fd0c9c24a1aa32a8ef.1690273969.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1690273969.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>

Only do the get/set tests on present and blessed registers
since we don't know the capabilities of any new ones.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index 43a919f2208f..2232620fb797 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ extern int vcpu_configs_n;
 	for_each_reg_filtered(i)						\
 		if (!find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
 
+#define for_each_present_blessed_reg(i)						\
+	for_each_reg(i)								\
+		if (find_reg(blessed_reg, blessed_n, reg_list->reg[i]))
+
 static const char *config_name(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 {
 	struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
@@ -183,6 +187,16 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	for_each_sublist(c, s)
+		blessed_n += s->regs_n;
+	blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
+
+	n = 0;
+	for_each_sublist(c, s) {
+		for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
+			blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We only test that we can get the register and then write back the
 	 * same value. Some registers may allow other values to be written
@@ -192,8 +206,11 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 	 * be written need to have the other values tested, then we should
 	 * create a new set of tests for those in a new independent test
 	 * executable.
+	 *
+	 * Only do the get/set tests on present, blessed list registers,
+	 * since we don't know the capabilities of any new registers.
 	 */
-	for_each_reg(i) {
+	for_each_present_blessed_reg(i) {
 		uint8_t addr[2048 / 8];
 		struct kvm_one_reg reg = {
 			.id = reg_list->reg[i],
@@ -236,16 +253,6 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for_each_sublist(c, s)
-		blessed_n += s->regs_n;
-	blessed_reg = calloc(blessed_n, sizeof(__u64));
-
-	n = 0;
-	for_each_sublist(c, s) {
-		for (i = 0; i < s->regs_n; ++i)
-			blessed_reg[n++] = s->regs[i];
-	}
-
 	for_each_new_reg(i)
 		++new_regs;
 
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
