[PATCH 2/7] proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache

From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@gmail.com>,
	"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:48:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu9d9e8z.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871rqpaswu.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:46:25 -0600")


This prepares the way for allowing the pid part of proc to use this
dcache pruning code as well.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 fs/proc/inode.c       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/proc/internal.h    |  1 +
 fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 35 +----------------------------------
 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index bdae442d5262..74ce4a8d05eb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -103,6 +103,44 @@ void __init proc_init_kmemcache(void)
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry) >= SIZEOF_PDE);
 }
 
+void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	struct inode *inode;
+	struct proc_inode *ei;
+	struct hlist_node *node;
+	struct super_block *sb;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	for (;;) {
+		node = hlist_first_rcu(inodes);
+		if (!node)
+			break;
+		ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes);
+		spin_lock(lock);
+		hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes);
+		spin_unlock(lock);
+
+		inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
+		sb = inode->i_sb;
+		if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
+			continue;
+		inode = igrab(inode);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		if (unlikely(!inode)) {
+			deactivate_super(sb);
+			rcu_read_lock();
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		d_prune_aliases(inode);
+		iput(inode);
+		deactivate_super(sb);
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 static int proc_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
 {
 	struct super_block *sb = root->d_sb;
diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
index 366cd3aa690b..ba9a991824a5 100644
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ extern const struct inode_operations proc_pid_link_inode_operations;
 extern const struct super_operations proc_sops;
 
 void proc_init_kmemcache(void);
+void proc_prune_siblings_dcache(struct hlist_head *inodes, spinlock_t *lock);
 void set_proc_pid_nlink(void);
 extern struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *, struct proc_dir_entry *);
 extern void proc_entry_rundown(struct proc_dir_entry *);
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index 42fbb7f3c587..5da9d7f7ae34 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -269,40 +269,7 @@ static void unuse_table(struct ctl_table_header *p)
 
 static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head)
 {
-	struct inode *inode;
-	struct proc_inode *ei;
-	struct hlist_node *node;
-	struct super_block *sb;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for (;;) {
-		node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes);
-		if (!node)
-			break;
-		ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes);
-		spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
-		hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes);
-		spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
-
-		inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
-		sb = inode->i_sb;
-		if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active))
-			continue;
-		inode = igrab(inode);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
-		if (unlikely(!inode)) {
-			deactivate_super(sb);
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		d_prune_aliases(inode);
-		iput(inode);
-		deactivate_super(sb);
-
-		rcu_read_lock();
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+	proc_prune_siblings_dcache(&head->inodes, &sysctl_lock);
 }
 
 /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */
-- 
2.20.1

