From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_components() position
Date: 23 Aug 2019 09:58:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o90g7lbd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wof47ldc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.
soc_probe_link_components() has paired soc_remove_link_components(),
but, these are implemented at different place.
So it is difficult to confirm code.
This patch moves soc_probe_link_components() next to
soc_remove_link_components().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index 8e831ae..2a166ab 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -1135,6 +1135,26 @@ static void soc_remove_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
}
}
+static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
+ struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int order)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_component *component;
+ struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list *rtdcom;
+ int ret;
+
+ for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
+ component = rtdcom->component;
+
+ if (component->driver->probe_order == order) {
+ ret = soc_probe_component(card, component);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void soc_remove_dai_links(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
int order;
@@ -1379,26 +1399,6 @@ static int soc_rtd_init(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, const char *name)
return 0;
}
-static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card,
- struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int order)
-{
- struct snd_soc_component *component;
- struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list *rtdcom;
- int ret;
-
- for_each_rtdcom(rtd, rtdcom) {
- component = rtdcom->component;
-
- if (component->driver->probe_order == order) {
- ret = soc_probe_component(card, component);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- }
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int soc_probe_dai(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, int order)
{
int ret;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-23 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-23 0:57 [PATCH 00/16] ASoC: soc-core cleanup Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:58 ` [PATCH 01/16] ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 10:46 ` Applied "ASoC: soc-core: rename soc_post_component_init() to soc_rtd_init()" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:58 ` [PATCH 02/16] ASoC: soc-core: add soc_rtd_free() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-09-02 12:23 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: add soc_rtd_free()" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:58 ` [PATCH 03/16] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_component() position Kuninori Morimoto
2019-09-02 12:23 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_component() position" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:58 ` [PATCH 04/16] ASoC: soc-core: dapm related setup at one place Kuninori Morimoto
2019-09-02 12:23 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: dapm related setup at one place" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:58 ` [PATCH 05/16] ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_dapm_init() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-09-02 12:23 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: add snd_soc_dapm_init()" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:58 ` Kuninori Morimoto [this message]
2019-09-02 12:23 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_components() position" " Mark Brown
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 07/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_probe_link_components() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 08/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_remove_link_components() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 09/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_remove_link_dais() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 10/16] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_dai() next to soc_remove_dai() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 11/16] ASoC: soc-core: add new soc_link_init() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 12/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_probe_link_dais() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 13/16] ASoC: soc-core: move soc_probe_link_dais() next to soc_remove_link_dais() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 14/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_bind_aux_dev() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 0:59 ` [PATCH 15/16] ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_aux_dev() Kuninori Morimoto
2019-08-23 1:00 ` [PATCH 16/16] ASoC: soc-core: self contained soc_unbind_aux_dev() Kuninori Morimoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o90g7lbd.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--to=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.