All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com, msuchanek@suse.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: [PATCH v18 09/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in pkey_disable_set/clear()
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:06:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e6851e1c71696f03cfa2c71377f0542d8dbd8d.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>

From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>

In some cases, a pkey's bits need not necessarily change
in a way that the value of the pkey register increases
when performing a pkey_disable_set() or decreases when
performing a pkey_disable_clear().

For example, on powerpc, if a pkey's current state is
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and we perform a pkey_write_disable()
on it, the bits still remain the same. We will observe
something similar when the pkey's current state is 0 and
a pkey_access_enable() is performed on it.

Either case would cause some assertions to fail. This
fixes the problem.

cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 4b1ddb526228..7fd52d5c4bfd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n",
 		__func__, pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
+		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() >= orig_pkey_reg);
 	dprintf1("END<---%s(%d, 0x%x)\n", __func__,
 		pkey, flags);
 }
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n", __func__,
 			pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		assert(read_pkey_reg() < orig_pkey_reg);
+		assert(read_pkey_reg() <= orig_pkey_reg);
 }
 
 void pkey_write_allow(int pkey)
-- 
2.17.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	bauerman@linux.ibm.com, msuchanek@suse.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: [PATCH v18 09/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in pkey_disable_set/clear()
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:06:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e6851e1c71696f03cfa2c71377f0542d8dbd8d.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200130063651.Oh1VdAPpYXrbZB8ohciSzuzXrMun0I4wWd54ausW6hk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>

From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>

In some cases, a pkey's bits need not necessarily change
in a way that the value of the pkey register increases
when performing a pkey_disable_set() or decreases when
performing a pkey_disable_clear().

For example, on powerpc, if a pkey's current state is
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and we perform a pkey_write_disable()
on it, the bits still remain the same. We will observe
something similar when the pkey's current state is 0 and
a pkey_access_enable() is performed on it.

Either case would cause some assertions to fail. This
fixes the problem.

cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 4b1ddb526228..7fd52d5c4bfd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n",
 		__func__, pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
+		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() >= orig_pkey_reg);
 	dprintf1("END<---%s(%d, 0x%x)\n", __func__,
 		pkey, flags);
 }
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n", __func__,
 			pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		assert(read_pkey_reg() < orig_pkey_reg);
+		assert(read_pkey_reg() <= orig_pkey_reg);
 }

 void pkey_write_allow(int pkey)
-- 
2.17.1

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, fweimer@redhat.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linuxram@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@redhat.com, msuchanek@suse.de,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v18 09/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in pkey_disable_set/clear()
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:06:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e6851e1c71696f03cfa2c71377f0542d8dbd8d.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com>

From: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>

In some cases, a pkey's bits need not necessarily change
in a way that the value of the pkey register increases
when performing a pkey_disable_set() or decreases when
performing a pkey_disable_clear().

For example, on powerpc, if a pkey's current state is
PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS and we perform a pkey_write_disable()
on it, the bits still remain the same. We will observe
something similar when the pkey's current state is 0 and
a pkey_access_enable() is performed on it.

Either case would cause some assertions to fail. This
fixes the problem.

cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 4b1ddb526228..7fd52d5c4bfd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ void pkey_disable_set(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n",
 		__func__, pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() > orig_pkey_reg);
+		pkey_assert(read_pkey_reg() >= orig_pkey_reg);
 	dprintf1("END<---%s(%d, 0x%x)\n", __func__,
 		pkey, flags);
 }
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ void pkey_disable_clear(int pkey, int flags)
 	dprintf1("%s(%d) pkey_reg: 0x%016llx\n", __func__,
 			pkey, read_pkey_reg());
 	if (flags)
-		assert(read_pkey_reg() < orig_pkey_reg);
+		assert(read_pkey_reg() <= orig_pkey_reg);
 }
 
 void pkey_write_allow(int pkey)
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-30  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-30  6:36 [PATCH v18 00/24] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 01/24] selftests/x86/pkeys: Move selftests to arch-neutral directory Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 02/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Rename all references to pkru to a generic name Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 03/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Move generic definitions to header file Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 04/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Move some definitions to arch-specific header Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 05/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Make gcc check arguments of sigsafe_printf() Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 06/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use sane types for pkey register Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 07/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Add helpers for pkey bits Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 08/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix pkey_disable_clear() Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` Sandipan Das [this message]
2020-01-30  6:36   ` [PATCH v18 09/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in pkey_disable_set/clear() Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 10/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 11/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use the correct huge page size Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 12/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce generic pkey abstractions Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 13/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce powerpc support Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 14/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix number of reserved powerpc pkeys Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 15/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Fix assertion in test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 16/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Improve checks to determine pkey support Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36 ` [PATCH v18 17/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:36   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 18/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 19/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Detect write violation on a mapped access-denied-key page Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 20/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Introduce a sub-page allocator Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 21/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Test correct behaviour of pkey-0 Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 22/24] selftests/vm/pkeys: Override access right definitions on powerpc Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 23/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Use the correct page size " Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37 ` [PATCH v18 24/24] selftests: vm: pkeys: Fix multilib builds for x86 Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30  6:37   ` Sandipan Das
2020-01-30 21:51 ` [PATCH v18 00/24] selftests, powerpc, x86: Memory Protection Keys Dave Hansen
2020-01-30 21:51   ` Dave Hansen
2020-03-02 10:25   ` Sandipan Das
2020-03-02 10:25     ` Sandipan Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90e6851e1c71696f03cfa2c71377f0542d8dbd8d.1580365432.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.