All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Douthit <stephend@silicom-usa.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: ahci: Lookup PCS register offset based on PCI device ID
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:22:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA9_cmcm_0tzBLQeEH7KsZxK4fggfSu2zDYRieajtoYS5ZidBA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190810074317.GA18582@infradead.org>

On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:43 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:24:31PM +0000, Stephen Douthit wrote:
> > Intel moved the PCS register from 0x92 to 0x94 on Denverton for some
> > reason, so now we get to check the device ID before poking it on reset.
>
> And now you just match on the new IDs, which means we'll perpetually
> catch up on any new device.  Dan, can you reach out inside Intel to
> figure out if there is a way to find out the PCS register location
> without the PCI ID check?

I'll ask. One guess for now is that num_ports >= 8 indicates the new
layout since the old layout ran out of space, but that might fall over
if the SOC uses the new layout, but implements fewer ports.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-10 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-08 20:24 [PATCH] ata: ahci: Lookup PCS register offset based on PCI device ID Stephen Douthit
2019-08-09  3:46 ` Jens Axboe
2019-08-09 14:13   ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-09 14:16     ` Jens Axboe
2019-08-10  7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-10 20:22   ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-08-12 13:02   ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-12 14:11     ` Jens Axboe
2019-08-12 16:29     ` Dan Williams
2019-08-12 17:49       ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-12 18:06         ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-12 19:12           ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-12 19:31           ` Dan Williams
2019-08-13  7:29             ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-13 22:07               ` Dan Williams
2019-08-14 14:34                 ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-14 16:09                   ` Dan Williams
2019-08-14 16:54                     ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-14 17:17                       ` Dan Williams
2019-08-19 16:30                         ` Stephen Douthit
2019-08-20  2:17                           ` Dan Williams
2019-08-20 13:59                             ` Stephen Douthit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA9_cmcm_0tzBLQeEH7KsZxK4fggfSu2zDYRieajtoYS5ZidBA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stephend@silicom-usa.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.