All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: page refcount race between prep_compound_gigantic_page() and __page_cache_add_speculative()?
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:03:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez23q0Jy9cuVnwAe7t_fdhMk2S7N5Hdi-GLcCeq5bsfLxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

== short summary ==
sysfs/sysctl writes can invoke prep_compound_gigantic_page(), which
forcibly zeroes the refcount of a page with refcount >=1. in the
extremely rare case where the refcount is >1 because of a temporary
reference from concurrent __page_cache_add_speculative(), stuff will
probably blow up.


Because of John Hubbard's question on the "[PATCH v2] mm/gup: fix
try_grab_compound_head() race with split_huge_page()" thread
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/50d828d1-2ce6-21b4-0e27-fb15daa77561@nvidia.com/),
I was looking around in related code, and stumbled over this old
commit, whose changes are still present in the current kernel, and
which looks wrong to me.

I'm not currently planning to try to fix this (because I'm not
familiar with the compaction code and its interaction with the page
allocator); so if someone who is more familiar with this stuff wants
to pick this up, feel free to do so.


commit 58a84aa92723d1ac3e1cc4e3b0ff49291663f7e1
Author: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Dec 8 14:34:18 2011 -0800

    thp: set compound tail page _count to zero

    Commit 70b50f94f1644 ("mm: thp: tail page refcounting fix") keeps all
    page_tail->_count zero at all times.  But the current kernel does not
    set page_tail->_count to zero if a 1GB page is utilized.  So when an
    IOMMU 1GB page is used by KVM, it wil result in a kernel oops because a
    tail page's _count does not equal zero.

      kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:386!
      invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
      Call Trace:
        gup_pud_range+0xb8/0x19d
        get_user_pages_fast+0xcb/0x192
        ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf
        hva_to_pfn+0x119/0x2f2
        gfn_to_pfn_memslot+0x2c/0x2e
        kvm_iommu_map_pages+0xfd/0x1c1
        kvm_iommu_map_memslots+0x7c/0xbd
        kvm_iommu_map_guest+0xaa/0xbf
        kvm_vm_ioctl_assigned_device+0x2ef/0xa47
        kvm_vm_ioctl+0x36c/0x3a2
        do_vfs_ioctl+0x49e/0x4e4
        sys_ioctl+0x5a/0x7c
        system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      RIP  gup_huge_pud+0xf2/0x159

    Signed-off-by: Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
    Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index bb28a5f9db8d..73f17c0293c0 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -576,6 +576,7 @@ static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct
page *page, unsigned long order)
        __SetPageHead(page);
        for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++, p = mem_map_next(p, page, i)) {
                __SetPageTail(p);
+               set_page_count(p, 0);
                p->first_page = page;
        }
 }
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 9dd443d89d8b..850009a7101e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ void prep_compound_page(struct page *page,
unsigned long order)
        __SetPageHead(page);
        for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++) {
                struct page *p = page + i;
-
                __SetPageTail(p);
+               set_page_count(p, 0);
                p->first_page = page;
        }
 }



__page_cache_add_speculative() can run on pages that have already been
allocated, and the only thing that can stop it from temporarily
lifting the page refcount is the page refcount being zero. So if these
set_page_count() calls have any effect (outside __init code), and the
refcount is not zero when they occur, then that means we can have a
race where a refcount is forcibly zeroed while
__page_cache_add_speculative() is holding temporary references; and
then we can end up with a use-after-free of struct page.

As far as I can tell, on the normal compound page allocation path
(prep_compound_page()), the whole compound page is coming fresh off
the allocator freelist (except for some __init logic) and only the
refcount of the head page has been initialized in post_alloc_hook();
and so all its tail pages are guaranteed to have a zero refcount. So
on that path the proper fix is probably to just replace the
set_page_count() call with a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().

The messier path, as the original commit describes, is "gigantic" page
allocation. In that case, we'll go through the following path (if we
ignore CMA):

  alloc_fresh_huge_page():
    alloc_gigantic_page()
      alloc_contig_pages()
        __alloc_contig_pages()
          alloc_contig_range()
            isolate_freepages_range()
              split_map_pages()
                post_alloc_hook() [FOR EVERY PAGE]
                  set_page_refcounted()
                    set_page_count(page, 1)
    prep_compound_gigantic_page()
      set_page_count(p, 0) [FOR EVERY TAIL PAGE]

so all the tail pages are initially allocated with refcount 1 by the
page allocator, and then we overwrite those refcounts with zeroes.


Luckily, the only non-__init codepath that can get here is
__nr_hugepages_store_common(), which is only invoked from privileged
writes to sysfs/sysctls.

             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-15 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-15 11:03 Jann Horn [this message]
2021-06-15 11:03 ` page refcount race between prep_compound_gigantic_page() and __page_cache_add_speculative()? Jann Horn
2021-06-15 12:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-15 18:27   ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG48ez23q0Jy9cuVnwAe7t_fdhMk2S7N5Hdi-GLcCeq5bsfLxw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.