All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: reuse CC_VERSION_TEXT
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:14:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQGUnzLSOHAwF6ebH7oOuNETAyf3nrdNgNNq7JsDgiFkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVkFOZq=5K=dKsQAFJPTmEE2gr_hVmYM=Q+rn70bSOh2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:46 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 2:49 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 7:01 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
> > Linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I noticed we're invoking $(CC) via $(shell) more than once to check the
> > > version.  Let's reuse the first string captured in $CC_VERSION_TEXT.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 315bab4e972d ("kbuild: fix endless syncconfig in case arch Makefile sets CROSS_COMPILE")
> >
> >
> > I did not touch this hunk because I have a plan
> > for different refactoring, but I have never got
> > around to do it.
> >
> > Anyway, you beat me, and I will pick this up.
> > But, the Fixes tag is questionable because
> > this is code refactoring.
> >
>
> When I see this... and hear refactoring... As a suggestion/improvement...
>
> Can we have LD_VERSION_TEXT analogue to CC_VERSION_TEXT?
> Both are shown when doing a `cat /proc/version` (and IIRC in file
> include/generated/compile.h).

Sorry, I had forgotten to answer this question.

Probably, we should do so.

Feeding it to Kconfig allows us to re-evaluate
config settings when tools are upgraded.

One question is where we should draw a line.
If we record the version text of CC, LD,
we should do that for more tools?

For LD, I will be probably OK because
some features rely on LD_VERSION or $(ld-option ).


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-24  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-05 22:01 [PATCH] Makefile: reuse CC_VERSION_TEXT Nick Desaulniers
2021-02-06  1:48 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-02-06  3:45   ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-24  3:14     ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2021-02-24 17:17       ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-02-23 20:10   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-02-24  2:37     ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7LNAQGUnzLSOHAwF6ebH7oOuNETAyf3nrdNgNNq7JsDgiFkA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.