Re: [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] dt-bindings: display: bridge: nxp,tda998x: Convert to json-schema

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi Russell,

Thanks for your comments!

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:08 AM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:04:48PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > +    properties:
> > > +      port@0:
> > > +        type: object
> > > +        description: FIXME
> >
> > Looks like the input from the example
> >
> > > +
> > > +      port@1:
> > > +        type: object
> > > +        description: FIXME
> >
> > Presumably the output to connector or another bridge.
>
> This is changing the binding. The original had:
>
> Required node:
>   - port: Input port node with endpoint definition, as described
>         in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt

Indeed, cfr. "Add ports hierarchy, as an alternative to port." in the
patch description. Some users use port, other use ports with one or
two port subnodes.

> The above change appears to require that tda998x now has two ports.

No, you can still use port:

+oneOf:
+  - required:
+      - port
+  - required:
+      - ports

When using ports, no further requirements are set, but perhaps port@0
should be made required in that case?

> This goes against current usage in DT and the example.

The original example didn't even have the original required input
port node, so it was incomplete.

arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0-cat874.dts has two port subnodes.
Is that wrong?

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds