From: hector.oron@gmail.com (Hector Oron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: i.MX multi SoC patches
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAODfWeFeaw2+xe01c5fiSr1tYsdM8J8ahZz8t-B7uuD+-P0GCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314172987-10349-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Hello Sascha,
2011/8/24 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>:
> This is hopefully the last iteration of the patches for compiling
> all ARMv4/v5 based i.MXs together. CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT
> lost its experimental status and we can still build uImages
> even with CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR enabled. This series selects
> these options and makes a multi SoC image the default.
> Also, we can now build all i.MX5 SoCs into a single image.
> This series also updates the defconfigs.
Thanks very much for doing this work, it is very much appreciated.
I have not yet been able to test this work at runtime, but I have
attempted to compile
your branch 'imx-features' which seems to keep all this work. I have
noticed a name
clashing producing the following compile time error:
arch/arm/plat-mxc/devices/platform-pata_imx.c:33: error:
?MX51_INT_ATA? undeclared here (not in a function)
Lurking a bit in the archive I noticed that Uwe patch
<http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106633/> it is assumed, but not applied.
Attached there is a refreshed patch which applies to your 'imx-features' branch.
With kind regards,
--
?H?ctor Or?n ?-.. . -... .. .- -. ? -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ARM-mx5-fix-remaining-unconsistent-names-for-irqs-v2.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8976 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110825/506838f5/attachment-0001.bin>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 8:03 i.MX multi SoC patches Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together ARMv4 and ARMv5 based SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM i.MX: allow to compile together all i.MX5 " Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM i.MX5: update defconfig Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM i.MX defconfigs: use one defconfig for all ARMv4/v5 SoCs Sascha Hauer
2011-08-24 23:03 ` Hector Oron [this message]
2011-08-25 6:38 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Sascha Hauer
2011-08-25 11:44 ` hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:44 ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 11:52 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-25 12:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: mx5: fix remaining unconsistent names for irqs hector.oron at gmail.com
2011-08-25 14:16 ` Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
2011-08-25 14:54 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-08-31 13:02 ` i.MX multi SoC patches Hector Oron
2011-08-31 14:05 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAODfWeFeaw2+xe01c5fiSr1tYsdM8J8ahZz8t-B7uuD+-P0GCQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hector.oron@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.