From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Subject: Applied "regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs" to the regulator tree Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:04:05 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E1asESr-0006jg-Ln@debutante> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1460986390-9674-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> The patch regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 94be46b9e5e2954b6d5962750f8aae8b5f099baa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:33:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs Driver did not provide default value for ramp delay for LDOs which lead to warning in dmesg, e.g. on Odroid XU4: [ 1.486076] vdd_ldo9: ramp_delay not set [ 1.506875] vddq_mmc2: ramp_delay not set [ 1.523766] vdd_ldo15: ramp_delay not set [ 1.544702] vdd_sd: ramp_delay not set The datasheet for all the S2MPS1x family is inconsistent here and does not specify unambiguously the value of ramp delay for LDO. It mentions 30 mV/us in one timing diagram but then omits it completely in LDO regulator characteristics table (it is specified for bucks). However the vendor kernels for Galaxy S5 and Odroid XU3 use values of 12 mV/us or 24 mV/us. Without the ramp delay value the consumers do not wait for voltage settle after changing it. Although the proper value of ramp delay for LDOs is unknown, it seems safer to use at least some value from reference kernel than to leave it unset. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 1 + include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c index 46e5a2922c4d..47c7de8f39e9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops s2mps11_buck_ops = { .ops = &s2mps11_ldo_ops, \ .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \ .owner = THIS_MODULE, \ + .ramp_delay = RAMP_DELAY_12_MVUS, \ .min_uV = MIN_800_MV, \ .uV_step = step, \ .n_voltages = S2MPS11_LDO_N_VOLTAGES, \ diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h index 6bc4bcd488ac..5a23dd4df432 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ #define MIN_600_MV 600000 #define MIN_500_MV 500000 +/* Ramp delay in uV/us */ +#define RAMP_DELAY_12_MVUS 12000 + /* Macros to represent steps for LDO/BUCK */ #define STEP_50_MV 50000 #define STEP_25_MV 25000 -- 2.8.0.rc3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Subject: Applied "regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs" to the regulator tree Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 20:04:05 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <E1asESr-0006jg-Ln@debutante> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1460986390-9674-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> The patch regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >From 94be46b9e5e2954b6d5962750f8aae8b5f099baa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:33:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs Driver did not provide default value for ramp delay for LDOs which lead to warning in dmesg, e.g. on Odroid XU4: [ 1.486076] vdd_ldo9: ramp_delay not set [ 1.506875] vddq_mmc2: ramp_delay not set [ 1.523766] vdd_ldo15: ramp_delay not set [ 1.544702] vdd_sd: ramp_delay not set The datasheet for all the S2MPS1x family is inconsistent here and does not specify unambiguously the value of ramp delay for LDO. It mentions 30 mV/us in one timing diagram but then omits it completely in LDO regulator characteristics table (it is specified for bucks). However the vendor kernels for Galaxy S5 and Odroid XU3 use values of 12 mV/us or 24 mV/us. Without the ramp delay value the consumers do not wait for voltage settle after changing it. Although the proper value of ramp delay for LDOs is unknown, it seems safer to use at least some value from reference kernel than to leave it unset. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c | 1 + include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c index 46e5a2922c4d..47c7de8f39e9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/s2mps11.c @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ static struct regulator_ops s2mps11_buck_ops = { .ops = &s2mps11_ldo_ops, \ .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \ .owner = THIS_MODULE, \ + .ramp_delay = RAMP_DELAY_12_MVUS, \ .min_uV = MIN_800_MV, \ .uV_step = step, \ .n_voltages = S2MPS11_LDO_N_VOLTAGES, \ diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h index 6bc4bcd488ac..5a23dd4df432 100644 --- a/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h +++ b/include/linux/mfd/samsung/core.h @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ #define MIN_600_MV 600000 #define MIN_500_MV 500000 +/* Ramp delay in uV/us */ +#define RAMP_DELAY_12_MVUS 12000 + /* Macros to represent steps for LDO/BUCK */ #define STEP_50_MV 50000 #define STEP_25_MV 25000 -- 2.8.0.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 19:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-04-18 13:33 [PATCH v2] regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs Krzysztof Kozlowski 2016-04-18 17:03 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-04-18 19:04 ` Mark Brown [this message] 2016-04-18 19:04 ` Applied "regulator: s2mps11: Set default ramp delay for S2MPS11 LDOs" to the regulator tree Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=E1asESr-0006jg-Ln@debutante \ --to=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \ --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \ --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \ --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sbkim73@samsung.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.