All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	briannorris@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling" to the spi tree
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:53:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1dekLZ-0005dc-Ed@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502109620-26813-2-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>

The patch

   spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 43de979ddc099c57858b243619c66e2f663a2f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 20:40:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

Slightly rework return value handling, no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
index 0b4a52b3e1dc..5497650992c7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static bool rockchip_spi_can_dma(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs;
 	struct spi_master *master;
 	struct resource *mem;
@@ -703,13 +703,13 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable apb_pclk\n");
 		goto err_put_master;
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable spi_clk\n");
 		goto err_disable_apbclk;
 	}
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register master\n");
 		goto err_free_dma_rx;
 	}
@@ -834,12 +834,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = spi_master_suspend(rs->master);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
@@ -849,12 +849,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 	pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
@@ -901,14 +901,14 @@ static int rockchip_spi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-- 
2.13.3

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.orgbroonie@kernel.org,
	briannorris@chromium.org, dianders@chromium.org, heiko@sntech.de,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.orglinux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling" to the spi tree
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:53:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1dekLZ-0005dc-Ed@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502109620-26813-2-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>

The patch

   spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From 43de979ddc099c57858b243619c66e2f663a2f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 20:40:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

Slightly rework return value handling, no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
index 0b4a52b3e1dc..5497650992c7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static bool rockchip_spi_can_dma(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs;
 	struct spi_master *master;
 	struct resource *mem;
@@ -703,13 +703,13 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable apb_pclk\n");
 		goto err_put_master;
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable spi_clk\n");
 		goto err_disable_apbclk;
 	}
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register master\n");
 		goto err_free_dma_rx;
 	}
@@ -834,12 +834,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = spi_master_suspend(rs->master);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
@@ -849,12 +849,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 	pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
@@ -901,14 +901,14 @@ static int rockchip_spi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-- 
2.13.3

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Applied "spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling" to the spi tree
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:53:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1dekLZ-0005dc-Ed@debutante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502109620-26813-2-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>

The patch

   spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 43de979ddc099c57858b243619c66e2f663a2f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 20:40:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling

Slightly rework return value handling, no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
index 0b4a52b3e1dc..5497650992c7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static bool rockchip_spi_can_dma(struct spi_master *master,
 
 static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs;
 	struct spi_master *master;
 	struct resource *mem;
@@ -703,13 +703,13 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable apb_pclk\n");
 		goto err_put_master;
 	}
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable spi_clk\n");
 		goto err_disable_apbclk;
 	}
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register master\n");
 		goto err_free_dma_rx;
 	}
@@ -834,12 +834,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = spi_master_suspend(rs->master);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
@@ -849,12 +849,12 @@ static int rockchip_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
 
 	pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(dev);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 	struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 	}
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
 
@@ -901,14 +901,14 @@ static int rockchip_spi_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
 	struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->apb_pclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	ret = clk_prepare_enable(rs->spiclk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret < 0)
 		clk_disable_unprepare(rs->apb_pclk);
 
-	return ret;
+	return 0;
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
 
-- 
2.13.3

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-07 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07 12:40 [PATCH 0/3] Fix clock handling in rockchip spi suspend/resume/remove Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40 ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40   ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 15:53   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Applied "spi: rockchip: Slightly rework return value handling" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-07 12:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] spi: rockchip: Fix clock handling in remove Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40   ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 15:53   ` Applied "spi: rockchip: Fix clock handling in remove" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-07 12:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] spi: rockchip: Fix clock handling in suspend/resume Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 12:40   ` Jeffy Chen
2017-08-07 15:53   ` Applied "spi: rockchip: Fix clock handling in suspend/resume" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-07 15:53     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1dekLZ-0005dc-Ed@debutante \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.