All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 06:38:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEBkKlxZOgUxtQEm@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303034418.106762-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:44:18PM -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> This fixes a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.

"Fix a"

Let's stick to the imperative form in commit messages.

> 
> $ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
> 
>  EXTRACT_CERTS   ../
> At main.c:154:
> - SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
> extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
> make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 (ignored)
> 
> When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
> into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2].  Change from
> using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING  to the new
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
> ---
>  certs/Makefile    | 7 +++++--
>  certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
> index e3f4926fd21e..3bc43c88a6d2 100644
> --- a/certs/Makefile
> +++ b/certs/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
>  #
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o common.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o revocation_certificates.o common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o common.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
> +endif
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
>  else
> @@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ $(obj)/signing_key.x509: scripts/extract-cert $(X509_DEP) FORCE
>  	$(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(MODULE_SIG_KEY_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY))
>  endif # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
>  
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
>  
>  $(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS))
>  
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 723b19c96256..c9a435b15af4 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
>  
>  static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  extern __initconst const u8 revocation_certificate_list[];
>  extern __initconst const unsigned long revocation_certificate_list_size;
> +#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * The description must be a type prefix, a colon and then an even number of
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>   */
>  device_initcall(blacklist_init);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  /*
>   * Load the compiled-in list of revocation X.509 certificates.
>   */
> @@ -237,3 +240,4 @@ static __init int load_revocation_certificate_list(void)
>  				     blacklist_keyring);
>  }
>  late_initcall(load_revocation_certificate_list);
> +#endif
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 
> 

Code change looks good.

/Jarkko

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03  3:44 [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list Eric Snowberg
2021-03-03  9:24 ` David Howells
2021-03-04  2:45   ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 15:25   ` David Howells
2021-03-04  4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEBkKlxZOgUxtQEm@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.