All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: xiubli@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, jlayton@kernel.org,
	marc.dionne@auristor.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, william.kucharski@oracle.com,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com,
	vshankar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 14:26:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsbfCcNvjMVcT2yx@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2520851.1657200105@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 02:21:45PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> -					 struct folio *folio, void **_fsdata);
> +					 struct folio **_folio, void **_fsdata);

The usual convention is that _foo means "Don't touch".  This should
probably be named "foliop" (ie pointer to a thing that would normally
be called folio).


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-07 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-07  4:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] netfs: fix the crash when unlocking the folio xiubli
2022-07-07  4:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice xiubli
2022-07-07  4:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] afs: unlock the folio when vnode is marked deleted xiubli
2022-07-07 10:56   ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-07 12:52   ` David Howells
2022-07-07 12:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice David Howells
2022-07-08  0:34   ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-07 12:53 ` David Howells
2022-07-07 13:21 ` [PATCH v4] " David Howells
2022-07-07 13:26   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-07-11  4:19     ` Xiubo Li
2022-07-09  0:27   ` Xiubo Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsbfCcNvjMVcT2yx@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-cachefs@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
    --cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
    --cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.