All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/8 V2] xfs: AGF length has never been bounds checked
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:09:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJzn1QMNdCAXx4Il@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230628175211.GX11441@frogsfrogsfrogs>

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

The AGF verifier does not check that the AGF length field is within
known good bounds. This has never been checked by runtime kernel
code (i.e. the lack of verification goes back to 1993) yet we assume
in many places that it is correct and verify other metdata against
it.

Add length verification to the AGF verifier. The length of the AGF
must be equal to the size of the AG specified in the superblock,
unless it is the last AG in the filesystem. In that case, it must be
less than or equal to sb->sb_agblocks and greater than
XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS, which is the smallest AG a growfs operation will
allow to exist.

This requires a bit of rework of the verifier function. We want to
verify metadata before we use it to verify other metadata. Hence
we need to verify the AGF sequence numbers before using them to
verify the length of the AGF. Then we can verify the AGF length
before we verify AGFL fields. Then we can verifier other fields that
are bounds limited by the AGF length.

And, finally, by calculating agf_length only once into a local
variable, we can collapse repeated "if (xfs_has_foo() &&"
conditionaly checks into single checks. This makes the code much
easier to follow as all the checks for a given feature are obviously
in the same place.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---

Version 2:
- growfs will write the new AGFs before the superblock has been
  updated, so we have to skip the new runt AGF seqno check otherwise
  it will fail.

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
index 1e72b91daff6..fe7d5ea47b90 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
@@ -2974,6 +2974,7 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = bp->b_mount;
 	struct xfs_agf		*agf = bp->b_addr;
+	uint32_t		agf_length = be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length);
 
 	if (xfs_has_crc(mp)) {
 		if (!uuid_equal(&agf->agf_uuid, &mp->m_sb.sb_meta_uuid))
@@ -2985,18 +2986,49 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
 	if (!xfs_verify_magic(bp, agf->agf_magicnum))
 		return __this_address;
 
-	if (!(XFS_AGF_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_versionnum)) &&
-	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) <= be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length) &&
-	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) < xfs_agfl_size(mp) &&
-	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_fllast) < xfs_agfl_size(mp) &&
-	      be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount) <= xfs_agfl_size(mp)))
+	if (!XFS_AGF_GOOD_VERSION(be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_versionnum)))
 		return __this_address;
 
-	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length) > mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks)
+	/*
+	 * Both agf_seqno and agf_length need to validated before anything else
+	 * block number related in the AGF or AGFL can be checked.
+	 *
+	 * During growfs operations, the perag is not fully initialised,
+	 * so we can't use it for any useful checking. growfs ensures we can't
+	 * use it by using uncached buffers that don't have the perag attached
+	 * so we can detect and avoid this problem.
+	 */
+	if (bp->b_pag && be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != bp->b_pag->pag_agno)
+		return __this_address;
+
+	/*
+	 * Only the last AGF in the filesytsem is allowed to be shorter
+	 * than the AG size recorded in the superblock.
+	 */
+	if (agf_length != mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks) {
+		/*
+		 * During growfs, the new last AGF can get here before we
+		 * have updated the superblock. Give it a pass on the seqno
+		 * check.
+		 */
+		if (bp->b_pag &&
+		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != mp->m_sb.sb_agcount - 1)
+			return __this_address;
+		if (agf_length < XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)
+			return __this_address;
+		if (agf_length > mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks)
+			return __this_address;
+	}
+
+	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flfirst) >= xfs_agfl_size(mp))
+		return __this_address;
+	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_fllast) >= xfs_agfl_size(mp))
+		return __this_address;
+	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_flcount) > xfs_agfl_size(mp))
 		return __this_address;
 
 	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) < be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_longest) ||
-	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
+	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_freeblks) > agf_length)
 		return __this_address;
 
 	if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_BNO]) < 1 ||
@@ -3007,38 +3039,28 @@ xfs_agf_verify(
 						mp->m_alloc_maxlevels)
 		return __this_address;
 
-	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp) &&
-	    (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) < 1 ||
-	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) >
-						mp->m_rmap_maxlevels))
-		return __this_address;
-
-	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp) &&
-	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
-		return __this_address;
-
-	/*
-	 * during growfs operations, the perag is not fully initialised,
-	 * so we can't use it for any useful checking. growfs ensures we can't
-	 * use it by using uncached buffers that don't have the perag attached
-	 * so we can detect and avoid this problem.
-	 */
-	if (bp->b_pag && be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno) != bp->b_pag->pag_agno)
-		return __this_address;
-
 	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) &&
-	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_btreeblks) > be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
+	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_btreeblks) > agf_length)
 		return __this_address;
 
-	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp) &&
-	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_blocks) >
-	    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_length))
-		return __this_address;
+	if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp)) {
+		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_rmap_blocks) > agf_length)
+			return __this_address;
 
-	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp) &&
-	    (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) < 1 ||
-	     be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) > mp->m_refc_maxlevels))
-		return __this_address;
+		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) < 1 ||
+		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_levels[XFS_BTNUM_RMAP]) >
+							mp->m_rmap_maxlevels)
+			return __this_address;
+	}
+
+	if (xfs_has_reflink(mp)) {
+		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_blocks) > agf_length)
+			return __this_address;
+
+		if (be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) < 1 ||
+		    be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_refcount_level) > mp->m_refc_maxlevels)
+			return __this_address;
+	}
 
 	return NULL;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-29  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-27 22:44 [PATCH 0/8 v3] xfs: various fixes for 6.5 Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: don't reverse order of items in bulk AIL insertion Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28  9:55   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-28 17:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: use deferred frees for btree block freeing Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:46   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:55     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  7:52   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: pass alloc flags through to xfs_extent_busy_flush() Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  9:44   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: allow extent free intents to be retried Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:48   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-28 22:57     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-29  9:50   ` Chandan Babu R
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: don't block in busy flushing when freeing extents Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: journal geometry is not properly bounds checked Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28  6:38     ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: AGF length has never been " Dave Chinner
2023-06-28 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29  2:09     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-06-29 16:35       ` [PATCH 7/8 V2] " Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 22:33         ` Dave Chinner
2023-06-27 22:44 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: fix bounds check in xfs_defer_agfl_block() Dave Chinner
2023-06-28  6:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-06-28 17:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 19:42 ` [RFC PATCH 9/8] xfs: AGI length should be bounds checked Darrick J. Wong
2023-06-29 22:35   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZJzn1QMNdCAXx4Il@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.