All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:57:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZS6EvMiJ0QF5INkv@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b463b420-c2be-49c5-bed6-0ff896851adb@arm.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 18:54, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 05:15:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >>
> >> [auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
> >> [also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf arm/for-next kvmarm/next soc/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231013]
> >> [cannot apply to arm/fixes]
> >> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> >> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> >> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >>
> >> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/arm64-mm-Hoist-synchronization-out-of-set_ptes-loop/20231005-231636
> >> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
> >> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005140730.2191134-1-ryan.roberts%40arm.com
> >> patch subject: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
> >> config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >> compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
> >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >>
> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/
> >>
> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >>
> >>    In file included from net/ipv4/route.c:66:
> >>    In file included from include/linux/mm.h:29:
> >>    In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
> >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:344:65: warning: parameter 'addr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
> >>      344 | static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >>          |                                                                 ^
> >>    1 warning generated.
> > 
> > Thanks for the report. I think something like below will do (I'll test
> > and commit as a separate patch, it's not something that Ryan's patch
> > introduces):
> 
> I was actually just trying to repro this and was planning to send out a v3 of my
> patch. But if you are happy to handle it as you suggest, then I guess you don't
> need anything further from me?

If you feel like testing, please give this a go ;)

------------8<---------------------------
From e6255237acfc21e92252653c3ed42446ef67f625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:57:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Mark the 'addr' argument to set_ptes() and
 __set_pte_at() as unused

This argument is not used by the arm64 implementation. Mark it as
__always_unused and also remove the unnecessary 'addr' increment in
set_ptes().

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 68984ba9ce2a..b19a8aee684c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -341,8 +341,9 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
 		mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages);
 }
 
-static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
-			      pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
+			    unsigned long __always_unused addr,
+			    pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
 {
 	page_table_check_ptes_set(mm, ptep, pte, nr);
 	__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);
@@ -353,7 +354,6 @@ static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 		if (--nr == 0)
 			break;
 		ptep++;
-		addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 		pte_val(pte) += PAGE_SIZE;
 	}
 }
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkdevmap(pmd_t pmd)
 #define pud_pfn(pud)		((__pud_to_phys(pud) & PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 #define pfn_pud(pfn,prot)	__pud(__phys_to_pud_val((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))
 
-static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
+				unsigned long __always_unused addr,
 				pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
 {
 	__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:57:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZS6EvMiJ0QF5INkv@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b463b420-c2be-49c5-bed6-0ff896851adb@arm.com>

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:36:43AM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 16/10/2023 18:54, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 05:15:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >>
> >> [auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
> >> [also build test WARNING on arm-perf/for-next/perf arm/for-next kvmarm/next soc/for-next linus/master v6.6-rc5 next-20231013]
> >> [cannot apply to arm/fixes]
> >> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> >> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> >> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >>
> >> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/arm64-mm-Hoist-synchronization-out-of-set_ptes-loop/20231005-231636
> >> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
> >> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005140730.2191134-1-ryan.roberts%40arm.com
> >> patch subject: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop
> >> config: arm64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >> compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
> >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231014/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >>
> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/
> >>
> >> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >>
> >>    In file included from net/ipv4/route.c:66:
> >>    In file included from include/linux/mm.h:29:
> >>    In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
> >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:344:65: warning: parameter 'addr' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
> >>      344 | static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> >>          |                                                                 ^
> >>    1 warning generated.
> > 
> > Thanks for the report. I think something like below will do (I'll test
> > and commit as a separate patch, it's not something that Ryan's patch
> > introduces):
> 
> I was actually just trying to repro this and was planning to send out a v3 of my
> patch. But if you are happy to handle it as you suggest, then I guess you don't
> need anything further from me?

If you feel like testing, please give this a go ;)

------------8<---------------------------
From e6255237acfc21e92252653c3ed42446ef67f625 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:57:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Mark the 'addr' argument to set_ptes() and
 __set_pte_at() as unused

This argument is not used by the arm64 implementation. Mark it as
__always_unused and also remove the unnecessary 'addr' increment in
set_ptes().

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310140531.BQQwt3NQ-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 68984ba9ce2a..b19a8aee684c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -341,8 +341,9 @@ static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
 		mte_sync_tags(pte, nr_pages);
 }
 
-static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
-			      pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
+static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm,
+			    unsigned long __always_unused addr,
+			    pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
 {
 	page_table_check_ptes_set(mm, ptep, pte, nr);
 	__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);
@@ -353,7 +354,6 @@ static inline void set_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 		if (--nr == 0)
 			break;
 		ptep++;
-		addr += PAGE_SIZE;
 		pte_val(pte) += PAGE_SIZE;
 	}
 }
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkdevmap(pmd_t pmd)
 #define pud_pfn(pud)		((__pud_to_phys(pud) & PUD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 #define pfn_pud(pfn,prot)	__pud(__phys_to_pud_val((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))
 
-static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
+static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm,
+				unsigned long __always_unused addr,
 				pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte, unsigned int nr)
 {
 	__sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-17 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-05 14:07 [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Hoist synchronization out of set_ptes() loop Ryan Roberts
2023-10-05 14:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-05 14:41 ` Steven Price
2023-10-05 14:41   ` Steven Price
2023-10-13 21:15 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-13 21:15   ` kernel test robot
2023-10-16 17:54   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-16 17:54     ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-17  7:36     ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-17  7:36       ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-17 12:57       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2023-10-17 12:57         ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-18  8:21         ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-18  8:21           ` Ryan Roberts
2023-10-18  9:36           ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-18  9:36             ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-18 10:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-18 10:15   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZS6EvMiJ0QF5INkv@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.