From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/32s: Allocate one 256k IBAT instead of two consecutives 128k IBATs Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:40:35 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ab58b296832b0ec650e2203200e060adbcb2677d.1637930421.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw) Today we have the following IBATs allocated: ---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]--- 0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000 4M Kernel x m 1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000 2M Kernel x m 2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000 1M Kernel x m 3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000 512K Kernel x m 4: 0xc0780000-0xc079ffff 0x00780000 128K Kernel x m 5: 0xc07a0000-0xc07bffff 0x007a0000 128K Kernel x m 6: - 7: - The two 128K should be a single 256K instead. When _etext is not aligned to 128Kbytes, the system will allocate all necessary BATs to the lower 128Kbytes boundary, then allocate an additional 128Kbytes BAT for the remaining block. Instead, align the top to 128Kbytes so that the function directly allocates a 256Mbytes last block: ---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]--- 0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000 4M Kernel x m 1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000 2M Kernel x m 2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000 1M Kernel x m 3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000 512K Kernel x m 4: 0xc0780000-0xc07bffff 0x00780000 256K Kernel x m 5: - 6: - 7: - Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> --- arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c index 27061583a010..33ab63d56435 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c @@ -196,18 +196,17 @@ void mmu_mark_initmem_nx(void) int nb = mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_USE_HIGH_BATS) ? 8 : 4; int i; unsigned long base = (unsigned long)_stext - PAGE_OFFSET; - unsigned long top = (unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET; + unsigned long top = ALIGN((unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET, SZ_128K); unsigned long border = (unsigned long)__init_begin - PAGE_OFFSET; unsigned long size; - for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top && top - base > (128 << 10);) { + for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top;) { size = block_size(base, top); setibat(i++, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT); base += size; } if (base < top) { size = block_size(base, top); - size = max(size, 128UL << 10); if ((top - base) > size) { size <<= 1; if (strict_kernel_rwx_enabled() && base + size > border) -- 2.33.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/32s: Allocate one 256k IBAT instead of two consecutives 128k IBATs Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:40:35 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ab58b296832b0ec650e2203200e060adbcb2677d.1637930421.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> (raw) Today we have the following IBATs allocated: ---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]--- 0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000 4M Kernel x m 1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000 2M Kernel x m 2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000 1M Kernel x m 3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000 512K Kernel x m 4: 0xc0780000-0xc079ffff 0x00780000 128K Kernel x m 5: 0xc07a0000-0xc07bffff 0x007a0000 128K Kernel x m 6: - 7: - The two 128K should be a single 256K instead. When _etext is not aligned to 128Kbytes, the system will allocate all necessary BATs to the lower 128Kbytes boundary, then allocate an additional 128Kbytes BAT for the remaining block. Instead, align the top to 128Kbytes so that the function directly allocates a 256Mbytes last block: ---[ Instruction Block Address Translation ]--- 0: 0xc0000000-0xc03fffff 0x00000000 4M Kernel x m 1: 0xc0400000-0xc05fffff 0x00400000 2M Kernel x m 2: 0xc0600000-0xc06fffff 0x00600000 1M Kernel x m 3: 0xc0700000-0xc077ffff 0x00700000 512K Kernel x m 4: 0xc0780000-0xc07bffff 0x00780000 256K Kernel x m 5: - 6: - 7: - Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> --- arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c index 27061583a010..33ab63d56435 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s32/mmu.c @@ -196,18 +196,17 @@ void mmu_mark_initmem_nx(void) int nb = mmu_has_feature(MMU_FTR_USE_HIGH_BATS) ? 8 : 4; int i; unsigned long base = (unsigned long)_stext - PAGE_OFFSET; - unsigned long top = (unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET; + unsigned long top = ALIGN((unsigned long)_etext - PAGE_OFFSET, SZ_128K); unsigned long border = (unsigned long)__init_begin - PAGE_OFFSET; unsigned long size; - for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top && top - base > (128 << 10);) { + for (i = 0; i < nb - 1 && base < top;) { size = block_size(base, top); setibat(i++, PAGE_OFFSET + base, base, size, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT); base += size; } if (base < top) { size = block_size(base, top); - size = max(size, 128UL << 10); if ((top - base) > size) { size <<= 1; if (strict_kernel_rwx_enabled() && base + size > border) -- 2.33.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-26 12:41 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-26 12:40 Christophe Leroy [this message] 2021-11-26 12:40 ` [PATCH] powerpc/32s: Allocate one 256k IBAT instead of two consecutives 128k IBATs Christophe Leroy 2021-12-03 3:55 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-12-03 3:55 ` Michael Ellerman 2021-12-15 0:24 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ab58b296832b0ec650e2203200e060adbcb2677d.1637930421.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=paulus@samba.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.