All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, dlatypov@google.com,
	davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
	cocci@inria.fr, smatch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, julia.lawall@inria.fr
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:21:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

Thanks to everybody who commented on v1 for your kind and much helpful feedback.

I tried to add suggestions and ideas while keeping the text concise.
Also, I took Dan and Julia's comments and included them into the
documentation (patch 2) because I think they were very helpful in
comparing the tools.
I didn't feel comfortable adding something comparing Sparse and
Coccinelle directly as I'm not an expert with any of these tools either.
Anyhow, that can be something to do in the future.

Thanks,
Marcelo

Marcelo Schmitt (2):
  Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools
  Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with
    discussion

 Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)

-- 
2.35.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com>
To: corbet@lwn.net, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, dlatypov@google.com,
	davidgow@google.com
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
	cocci@inria.fr, smatch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, julia.lawall@inria.fr
Subject: [cocci] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:21:48 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

Thanks to everybody who commented on v1 for your kind and much helpful feedback.

I tried to add suggestions and ideas while keeping the text concise.
Also, I took Dan and Julia's comments and included them into the
documentation (patch 2) because I think they were very helpful in
comparing the tools.
I didn't feel comfortable adding something comparing Sparse and
Coccinelle directly as I'm not an expert with any of these tools either.
Anyhow, that can be something to do in the future.

Thanks,
Marcelo

Marcelo Schmitt (2):
  Documentation: dev-tools: Add a section for static analysis tools
  Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with
    discussion

 Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)

-- 
2.35.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 23:21 Marcelo Schmitt [this message]
2022-03-29 23:21 ` [cocci] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a section for static analysis tools Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation: dev-tools: " Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:22   ` [cocci] " Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:48   ` Daniel Latypov
2022-03-29 23:48     ` [cocci] " Daniel Latypov
2022-03-30  2:33   ` David Gow
2022-03-30  2:33     ` [cocci] " David Gow
2022-03-30  8:04   ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-30  8:04     ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2022-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: Enhance static analysis section with discussion Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-29 23:23   ` [cocci] " Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-30  2:48   ` David Gow
2022-03-30  2:48     ` [cocci] " David Gow
2022-03-30  8:07     ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-30  8:07       ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall
2022-03-30 19:30     ` Marcelo Schmitt
2022-03-30 19:30       ` [cocci] " Marcelo Schmitt
2022-04-01  0:18       ` David Gow
2022-04-01  0:18         ` [cocci] " David Gow
2022-03-31  8:14     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-31  8:14       ` [cocci] " Dan Carpenter
2022-04-01  0:19       ` David Gow
2022-04-01  0:19         ` [cocci] " David Gow
2022-03-30  8:06   ` Julia Lawall
2022-03-30  8:06     ` [cocci] " Julia Lawall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1648593132.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
    --to=marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=smatch@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.