All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix off-by-one chunk length calculation at contains_pending_extent()
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:50:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <daee5e8b14d706fe4dd96bd910fd46038512861b.1709203710.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

At contains_pending_extent() the value of the end offset of a chunk we
found in the device's allocation state io tree is inclusive, so when
we calculate the length we pass to the in_range() macro, we must sum
1 to the expression "physical_end - physical_offset".

In practice the wrong calculation should be harmless as chunks sizes
are never 1 byte and we should never have 1 byte ranges of unallocated
space. Nevertheless fix the wrong calculation.

Fixes: 1c11b63eff2a ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree")
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.lyakas@zadara.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAOcd+r30e-f4R-5x-S7sV22RJPe7+pgwherA6xqN2_qe7o4XTg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 3cc947a42116..473fe92274d9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1401,7 +1401,7 @@ static bool contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 *start,
 
 		if (in_range(physical_start, *start, len) ||
 		    in_range(*start, physical_start,
-			     physical_end - physical_start)) {
+			     physical_end + 1 - physical_start)) {
 			*start = physical_end + 1;
 			return true;
 		}
-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-29 10:50 fdmanana [this message]
2024-03-01 21:11 ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix off-by-one chunk length calculation at contains_pending_extent() Josef Bacik
2024-03-02  0:35 ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=daee5e8b14d706fe4dd96bd910fd46038512861b.1709203710.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.