All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Kang Minchul' <tegongkang@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	Sidong Yang <realwakka@gmail.com>,
	"linux-staging@lists.linux.dev" <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] staging: pi433: Use div64_u64 instead of do_div
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 10:31:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2ec77060cc84a33b49d5fd11d7867f6@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019094015.832398-1-tegongkang@gmail.com>

From: Kang Minchul
> Sent: 19 October 2022 10:40
> 
> This commit removes warning generated by cocci as follows:
> 
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> 
> Using div64_u64 instead of do_div can avoid potential truncation.

Cocci is lying to you.

do_div() exists because a 64 by 32 bit divide is significantly
faster than a 64 by 64 divide.
This is particularly true on 32bit cpu, but is also true on
Intel x86_64 bit cpu.

So unless the result might actually be larger than 32 bits
(which requires code analysis) then do_div() is correct.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-19  9:40 [PATCH] staging: pi433: Use div64_u64 instead of do_div Kang Minchul
2022-10-19 10:31 ` David Laight [this message]
2022-10-19 14:20   ` Kang Minchul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2ec77060cc84a33b49d5fd11d7867f6@AcuMS.aculab.com \
    --to=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@gmail.com \
    --cc=realwakka@gmail.com \
    --cc=tegongkang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.