All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, hch@lst.de,
	ardb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init()
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:11:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e60d643e-4879-3fc3-737d-2c145332a6d7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103173159.27570-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

Hi!

On 03/11/2020 17:31, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> crashkernel might reserve memory located in ZONE_DMA. We plan to delay
> ZONE_DMA's initialization after unflattening the devicetree and ACPI's
> boot table initialization, so move it later in the boot process.
> Specifically into mem_init(), this is the last place crashkernel will be
> able to reserve the memory before the page allocator kicks in.

> There
> isn't any apparent reason for doing this earlier.

It's so that map_mem() can carve it out of the linear/direct map.
This is so that stray writes from a crashing kernel can't accidentally corrupt the kdump
kernel. We depend on this if we continue with kdump, but failed to offline all the other
CPUs. We also depend on this when skipping the checksum code in purgatory, which can be
exceedingly slow.

Grepping around, the current order is:

start_kernel()
-> setup_arch()
	-> arm64_memblock_init()	/* reserve */
	-> paging_init()
		-> map_mem()		/* carve out reservation */
[...]
	-> mm_init()
		-> mem_init()


I agree we should add comments to make this apparent!


Thanks,

James


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 095540667f0f..fc4ab0d6d5d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>  	else
>  		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
>  
> -	reserve_crashkernel();
> -
>  	reserve_elfcorehdr();
>  
>  	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
> @@ -508,6 +506,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>  	else
>  		swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
>  
> +	reserve_crashkernel();
> +
>  	set_max_mapnr(max_pfn - PHYS_PFN_OFFSET);
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init()
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:11:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e60d643e-4879-3fc3-737d-2c145332a6d7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103173159.27570-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

Hi!

On 03/11/2020 17:31, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> crashkernel might reserve memory located in ZONE_DMA. We plan to delay
> ZONE_DMA's initialization after unflattening the devicetree and ACPI's
> boot table initialization, so move it later in the boot process.
> Specifically into mem_init(), this is the last place crashkernel will be
> able to reserve the memory before the page allocator kicks in.

> There
> isn't any apparent reason for doing this earlier.

It's so that map_mem() can carve it out of the linear/direct map.
This is so that stray writes from a crashing kernel can't accidentally corrupt the kdump
kernel. We depend on this if we continue with kdump, but failed to offline all the other
CPUs. We also depend on this when skipping the checksum code in purgatory, which can be
exceedingly slow.

Grepping around, the current order is:

start_kernel()
-> setup_arch()
	-> arm64_memblock_init()	/* reserve */
	-> paging_init()
		-> map_mem()		/* carve out reservation */
[...]
	-> mm_init()
		-> mem_init()


I agree we should add comments to make this apparent!


Thanks,

James


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 095540667f0f..fc4ab0d6d5d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>  	else
>  		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
>  
> -	reserve_crashkernel();
> -
>  	reserve_elfcorehdr();
>  
>  	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
> @@ -508,6 +506,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>  	else
>  		swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
>  
> +	reserve_crashkernel();
> +
>  	set_max_mapnr(max_pfn - PHYS_PFN_OFFSET);
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> 

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jeremy.linton@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	will@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robin.murphy@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init()
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:11:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e60d643e-4879-3fc3-737d-2c145332a6d7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103173159.27570-2-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

Hi!

On 03/11/2020 17:31, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> crashkernel might reserve memory located in ZONE_DMA. We plan to delay
> ZONE_DMA's initialization after unflattening the devicetree and ACPI's
> boot table initialization, so move it later in the boot process.
> Specifically into mem_init(), this is the last place crashkernel will be
> able to reserve the memory before the page allocator kicks in.

> There
> isn't any apparent reason for doing this earlier.

It's so that map_mem() can carve it out of the linear/direct map.
This is so that stray writes from a crashing kernel can't accidentally corrupt the kdump
kernel. We depend on this if we continue with kdump, but failed to offline all the other
CPUs. We also depend on this when skipping the checksum code in purgatory, which can be
exceedingly slow.

Grepping around, the current order is:

start_kernel()
-> setup_arch()
	-> arm64_memblock_init()	/* reserve */
	-> paging_init()
		-> map_mem()		/* carve out reservation */
[...]
	-> mm_init()
		-> mem_init()


I agree we should add comments to make this apparent!


Thanks,

James


> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 095540667f0f..fc4ab0d6d5d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>  	else
>  		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
>  
> -	reserve_crashkernel();
> -
>  	reserve_elfcorehdr();
>  
>  	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
> @@ -508,6 +506,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>  	else
>  		swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
>  
> +	reserve_crashkernel();
> +
>  	set_max_mapnr(max_pfn - PHYS_PFN_OFFSET);
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 17:31 [PATCH v6 0/7] arm64: Default to 32-bit wide ZONE_DMA Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-05 16:11   ` James Morse [this message]
2020-11-05 16:11     ` James Morse
2020-11-05 16:11     ` James Morse
2020-11-06 18:46     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-06 18:46       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-06 18:46       ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-10 18:17       ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 18:17         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 18:17         ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-12 15:56         ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 15:56           ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-12 15:56           ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-13 11:29           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-13 11:29             ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-13 11:29             ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 14:09             ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 14:09               ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 14:09               ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 17:10               ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:10                 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:10                 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:25                   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:25                   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:25                 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 17:25                   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 17:25                   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-19 17:45                   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:45                     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 17:45                     ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-19 18:18       ` James Morse
2020-11-19 18:18         ` James Morse
2020-11-19 18:18         ` James Morse
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] arm64: mm: Move zone_dma_bits initialization into zone_sizes_init() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] of: unittest: Add test for of_dma_get_max_cpu_address() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on devicetree's dma-ranges Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64: mm: Set ZONE_DMA size based on early IORT scan Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] mm: Remove examples from enum zone_type comment Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-11-03 17:31   ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e60d643e-4879-3fc3-737d-2c145332a6d7@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.