From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: use of radiotap bit 14? Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:43:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1213900983.8967.70.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1188512214.7585.3.camel@johannes.berg> <1213897499.8967.46.camel@johannes.berg> <1213899201.2530.12.camel@dv> <1213899529.8967.62.camel@johannes.berg> <1213900799.3240.15.camel@dv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+MVaNuo+4SlOkaUuYORk" In-Reply-To: <1213900799.3240.15.camel@dv> Sender: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Pavel Roskin Cc: Gerald Combs , radiotap , David Young List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org --=-+MVaNuo+4SlOkaUuYORk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Well, yes, but it seemed prudent to not introduce a third > > "used-but-not-standardised" category and these bit numbers reflect the > > fact that they are indeed used with those bit numbers in varying OSes. >=20 > OK. And proper proposals should have "unassigned" under "Bit Number". Yeah, I'll add a note. > > I hope the audience of this website is smart enough to realise that. >=20 > Sure, but the contested fields set a bad example. It may be better to > write "don't do it again" in some places. Ok :) > > Well, I don't have a proposal yet, those fields that are there are > > sufficient if we also accept the vendor-namespaces idea that I'm just > > trying to put into understandable words. >=20 > There should be a local/testing/vendor area or bit numbers so that the > proposals can be tested before they are submitted. Another approach > would be to have an extra header consisting of items in the format like: [...] Dave had come up with a different proposal which I just captured on the wiki at http://www.radiotap.org/Discussion/Vendor-Extensions johannes --=-+MVaNuo+4SlOkaUuYORk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJIWqizAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYJ2YQAKLh96hpDfpI0aHdhGHdjqM4 +Y5K8xcPuIAlCwTx5QQFD8amKMaIxXC///stEUCSo1+VeDmkI3Z6ozUuCl1qE2dF o0+EiBwNzuxLLKI1V9W1GvjmJbun44E8aBAfhNdLxTyYJ63qU5dYL2sLEW4B2AUM uTaQXW/rj2/EyJ9sWJTt46yd77cYXvKGpot3LuQH4M/t0PD0p4fi+mKjSYkz9I6y bP/drSeDm8/hqlZMHiwhjK4C+6/mwD2IXjncf3XWGQ/yF+H9FDOXedA60YXTcvto hULEc4lJlN5jb2fFHYRLkEj7/XFupWZEfc4boGup3Adn2bWiy5udwpEmz8J3lDeb /JxHc0n5NOwlJKfARfyf+aR5G5PyDE/rbo+xgaIAcfvtvn/qBzPGWY2Wx1d0USP/ HYSxEzIQWAiwqnUju49/cGQ+fnTgDKE63/UHzwLvITnsSAw89BdODpyun8teT0Kx VtY1kXOSRBclXiMBywhyFoyOuwxRSRor55Nqw+fVNiepTc2QXjqxQvKq6CvixY0g 17zGpFRGLBYWnev+og7v7owJePPjw9Fx0lL00cmTYimq657INalrv24eWkYRtsB9 DVEJcU/b1QyZjAhwZDHsHcTeH7P8FXW13tWZuoKreHgeYoq55NCc8kXuUJ8GZTWd 2YD6hQg9r+cDNxY8fBgl =ZMma -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+MVaNuo+4SlOkaUuYORk--