From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS (repost 3) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:22:03 +0200 Message-ID: <1368710523.8387.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <518B72AE.4010402@rempel-privat.de> <5194A06A.3000103@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130516_110137_244706_0B9B5695) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5194A06A.3000103-YEK0n+YFykbzxQdaRaTXBw@public.gmane.org> (sfid-20130516_110137_244706_0B9B5695) Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: radiotap-qavaossjCcEdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, simon-vp0mx6+5gkqFX2APIN6yfw@public.gmane.org, "ath9k-devel-xDcbHBWguxHbcTqmT+pZeQ@public.gmane.org" , linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:01 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Hallo all, > > so, there is no updates or critic on this topic. That mean, every thing > is OK. I tend to agree. > I assume "suggested-fields/MCS extension for STBC and Ness" > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS%20extension%20for%20STBC%20and%20Ness > > can be moved to "defined-fields/MCS" > http://www.radiotap.org/defined-fields/MCS > > Johannes, your word ;) I don't really have any say, but go for it, for all I care :) johannes