From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: multi-antenna handling Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1403709105.4140.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1345481425.4459.46.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <1373273952.8312.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1403679889.4140.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20140625090901.fa121a689f823f3af1db1e3a@lm7.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140625090901.fa121a689f823f3af1db1e3a-yxGd9NVxpOI@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: Matteo Cypriani Cc: Guy Harris , Felix Fietkau , "radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 09:09 -0400, Matteo Cypriani wrote: > I observed the same on TP-Link TL-WDR3500 (which is also ath9k-based), and > assumed the signal in the first namespace was an average of the two others. > Should I understand this may be a wrong assumption? Ah, there's a value in the first part, without per-antenna information - that's the max of the per-antenna values. johannes