From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: Allocation of new presence bits, eg for HE, etc Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:21:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1513326080.26976.90.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20171214174316.GL12698@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: To: Richard Sharpe , radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 10:05 -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > Yes, I noticed those, but no bit assignments have been made. At least > one organization is interested in this. :-) > Is it a case of ANA (Add Next Available?) Yeah, that's really the only thing that makes sense, since parsing relies on the bit order. I've made my experimental Linux patches write it with bit 23 (and haven't implemented the HE-MU/other-user yet). > It will mean making sure that the tools doing captures add the bits > and that things like Wireshark are backward compatible. Yeah. Maybe we can/should have a "tentatively defined" state? I have been reluctant to post this for formal adoption because the HE spec isn't done yet, but at the same time we want this to be already usable by people. johannes