RadioTap Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <>
Subject: Re: [RFA] TLV fields for radiotap
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:14:58 +0200
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 10:47 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Since there were no comments, let's make this more formal. Any
> objections now?

Does this look like a good idea/compromise?

It's hard to do an entirely new version, then at least in Linux we'd
probably have to be able to switch versions on the fly for some time,
which is awkward ... but OTOH this feels a bit hackish.

No comments at all? :)


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-09  8:47 Johannes Berg
     [not found] ` <>
2018-09-04 12:14   ` Johannes Berg [this message]
     [not found]     ` <>
2018-11-20 20:09       ` Johannes Berg
     [not found]         ` <>
2018-12-18  2:05           ` David Young
     [not found]             ` <>
2018-12-18 13:45               ` Johannes Berg
     [not found]                 ` <>
2019-04-09  8:38                   ` Johannes Berg
2019-04-09  8:51 Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

RadioTap Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror radiotap/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 radiotap radiotap/ \
	public-inbox-index radiotap

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone