From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Young Subject: Re: use of radiotap bit 14? Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:17:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20070912171755.GA17887@che.ojctech.com> References: <1188512214.7585.3.camel@johannes.berg> <1188571628.24684.7.camel@dv> <46D846E4.20103@wireshark.org> <1188597475.7585.46.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1188597475.7585.46.camel-YfaajirXv214zXjbi5bjpg@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org Errors-To: radiotap-admin-rN9S6JXhQ+WXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Johannes Berg Cc: Gerald Combs , Pavel Roskin , radiotap List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 09:50 -0700, Gerald Combs wrote: > > > An earlier email from David Young discussed placing the Radiotap > > documentation in a more "official" location -- I think this would help > > immensely. For a developer starting from scratch, it's not immediately > > obvious where the canonical Radiotap specification is and it's very easy > > to get started down the wrong path. For example, if NetBSD Radiotap > > header and man page show up in Google's rankings for "radiotap" and > > "radiotap specification", they're pretty far down the list. > > I second that. If somebody has a domain registered, I can host a wiki > over with linuxwireless.org. Thank you for the offer! Beggars cannot be choosers, but perhaps the WireShark wiki is closer to "neutral ground" for a spec that the various operating systems (*BSD, Linux, Solaris??) will share? (Gerald?) Can we grant access to the radiotap wiki page to only active radiotap developers? Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyoung-eZodSLrBbDpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933 ext 24