RadioTap Archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Simon Barber <>
To: Johannes Berg <>
Cc: Thomas Pedersen <thomas-W/>,
Subject: Re: TSFT
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:43:29 -0800
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

One problem with fixing the calculations is that quite a lot of 
information is needed to do the calculation correctly. In Intel's case I 
don't know if Ness information is available, and this makes upto a 16us 
difference in the PLCP header length.

Calculating the start of the MPDU from the end accurately requires 
knowing the FEC scheme, the MCS, the guard interval, the bandwidth. Is 
the FEC scheme known, or are all current cards only supporting BCC?

Do you know if Intel supports extension spatial streams? If not the 
number is always 0. And FEC - is it always BCC?


On 11/18/2012 03:07 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-17 at 23:20 -0800, Simon Barber wrote:
>> Unfortunately this patch does not do a very accurate calculation, so it
>> makes the problem worse. It simply multiplies rate by the number of
>> bits to get a time. This does not take into account the limited
>> accuracy in rate (11n has fractional rates), nor does it consider the
>> rounding into blocks caused by FEC, or symbols. As a result the data is
>> made worse by the current code. Either the code should do an accurate
>> fix, or it should record the raw value and let the end user correct it
>> properly.
> If we can, I'd say we should fix the calculations.
> The question is how we define it when the first bit of the MPDU can be
> fractional in a symbol?
> johannes

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-17  6:26 TSFT Simon Barber
     [not found] ` <>
2012-11-17  6:48   ` TSFT David Young
     [not found]     ` <20121117064848.GO21779-Gq8g4XVd89tWk0Htik3J/>
2012-11-17  8:45       ` TSFT Johannes Berg
     [not found]         ` <>
2012-11-17 17:46           ` TSFT David Young
     [not found]             ` <20121117174600.GQ21779-Gq8g4XVd89tWk0Htik3J/>
2012-11-17 18:43               ` TSFT Johannes Berg
2012-11-17 18:56               ` TSFT Guy Harris
2012-11-17 23:26   ` TSFT Thomas Pedersen
2012-11-18  7:20     ` TSFT Simon Barber
     [not found]       ` <>
2012-11-18 11:07         ` TSFT Johannes Berg
     [not found]           ` <>
2012-11-20 22:43             ` Simon Barber [this message]
     [not found]               ` <>
2012-11-21 10:42                 ` TSFT Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --cc=thomas-W/ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

RadioTap Archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror radiotap/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 radiotap radiotap/ \
	public-inbox-index radiotap

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone