From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksij Rempel Subject: Re: Standardisation - adding 2 bit STBC and Ness to MCS Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:25:53 +0200 Message-ID: <51890EF1.8090006@rempel-privat.de> References: <518127ED.9060900@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130501_163425_421280_1DE3F635) <1367527479.11375.19.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5188AFFE.6070804@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20130507_094050_709302_8E653F0F) <1367934867.8328.31.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1367934904.8328.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1367934904.8328.32.camel-8Nb76shvtaUJvtFkdXX2HixXY32XiHfO@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: radiotap-qavaossjCcEdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, simon-vp0mx6+5gkqFX2APIN6yfw@public.gmane.org, Adrian Chadd , "ath9k-devel-xDcbHBWguxHbcTqmT+pZeQ@public.gmane.org" , linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org Am 07.05.2013 15:55, schrieb Johannes Berg: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 09:40 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>> Am 02.05.2013 22:44, schrieb Johannes Berg: >>>> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:34 +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>> >>>>>> With this I believe we have everything needed to start the 3 week >>>>>> comment period. >>>> >>>> Yeah, I guess there was plenty of time. I would have preferred a >>>> separate thread, but I guess there's little enough traffic on this list >>>> so it doesn't really matter. >>>> >>>>> There is a bit more then 3 week now. I would like to have this approved :) >>>>> Are there any thing needed to finish this? >>>> >>>> http://www.radiotap.org/Standardisation >>>> >>>> johannes >>>> >>> >>> ping. >>> >>> Johannes, are you the one who says last word on standardisation for >>> radiotap? >> >> No? I thought the link made that pretty clear. >> >> But since nobody poked holes in this and it's been a long time, I think >> you should probably just post "this has been adopted now" ... > > Or actually, go to step 5, preferably reposting it as a separate thread. Simon, will you do it? You stared it and did most of the work... -- Regards, Oleksij