From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Alwin Beukers" Subject: RE: [RFC] VHT fields Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 17:18:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: "radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org" Cc: Arend Van Spriel , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , Bill Stafford , Alwin Beukers , Johannes Berg List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org Hi everyone, Thanks for the feedback on the 802.11ac fields. If there are no further suggestions, I would like to request the SU_VHT, MU= _VHT and=20 PARTIAL_AID fields to be moved to the defined-fields section and have their= bit numbers assigned. As the group ID was merged into SU_VHT, the GROUP_ID field can be= dropped. With the bit numbers assigned I can deliver the Wireshark patch for parsing= these fields. Thanks, Alwin > Hi everyone, >=20 > This is a proposal for adding support for 802.11ac. Four fields were adde= d to the suggested-fields section: >=20 > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/SU_VHT > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MU_VHT > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/GROUP_ID > http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/PARTIAL_AID > > A Wireshark patch for parsing SU_VHT, GROUP_ID and PARTIAL_AID is attache= d. >=20 > Any thoughts? >=20 > Thanks, > Alwin