From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Sharpe Subject: Re: Allocation of new presence bits, eg for HE, etc Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:05:23 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20171214174316.GL12698@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: To: radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > Op 14 dec. 2017 18:51 schreef "Arend Van Spriel" > : >> >> Johannes already posted some proposals. >> >> See: >> >> http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE >> http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE-MU >> http://www.radiotap.org/fields/HE-MU-other-user Yes, I noticed those, but no bit assignments have been made. At least one organization is interested in this. Is it a case of ANA (Add Next Available?) It will mean making sure that the tools doing captures add the bits and that things like Wireshark are backward compatible. --=20 Regards, Richard Sharpe (=E4=BD=95=E4=BB=A5=E8=A7=A3=E6=86=82=EF=BC=9F=E5=94=AF=E6=9C=89=E6=9D=9C= =E5=BA=B7=E3=80=82--=E6=9B=B9=E6=93=8D)