From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Sharpe Subject: Re: Proposal for an S1G header for radiotap Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 10:35:13 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8d1bb1c53c670e7cfddfc0cf2f5e2447b2ee2ecb.camel@sipsolutions.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8d1bb1c53c670e7cfddfc0cf2f5e2447b2ee2ecb.camel-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: To: Johannes Berg Cc: radiotap-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, "Aaron J. Lee" , Ray Wang , tlin-+OaQ/Okkt+3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:33 AM Johannes Berg wr= ote: > > Hi Richard, > > > Attached is a git format-patch patch that contains a proposal for an S1= G header. > > > > This proposal was created by Aaron Lee and underwent a couple of > > rounds of modifications among the WFA folks. > > > > All I have done here is to transcribe it to the format required by the > > documentation web site. Hopefully I have not changed any intent. > > Thanks for doing this! :) > > > Below is some feedback from Johannes about the proposal so he does not > > have to retype it along with some comments from me. > > :-) > > Some *additional* feedback below - please do check my previous note > about aggregation handling, this is very unclear to me. I will look at the other comments separately, but I think Aggegration relates to A-MPDU if I am reading section 9.7 of 802.11ah-2016 correctly. In which case, we already have an A-MPDU header but we might need some changes. Perhaps the WFA folks or Aaron can comment on this/ --=20 Regards, Richard Sharpe (=E4=BD=95=E4=BB=A5=E8=A7=A3=E6=86=82=EF=BC=9F=E5=94=AF=E6=9C=89=E6=9D=9C= =E5=BA=B7=E3=80=82--=E6=9B=B9=E6=93=8D)(=E4=BC=A0=E8=AF=B4=E6=9D=9C=E5=BA= =B7=E6=98=AF=E9=85=92=E7=9A=84=E5=8F=91=E6=98=8E=E8=80=85)