rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
Date: Fri,  2 Aug 2019 08:14:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190802151501.13069-1-paulmck@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190802151435.GA1081@linux.ibm.com>

Upcoming ->nocb_lock contention-reduction work requires that the
rcu_segcblist structure's ->len field be concurrently manipulated,
but only if there are no-CBs CPUs in the kernel.  This commit
therefore makes this ->len field be an atomic_long_t, but only
in CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y kernels.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h |  4 ++
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c    | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h    | 12 ++++-
 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h b/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
index 82977726da29..38e4b811af9b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
@@ -65,7 +65,11 @@ struct rcu_segcblist {
 	struct rcu_head *head;
 	struct rcu_head **tails[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
 	unsigned long gp_seq[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+	atomic_long_t len;
+#else
 	long len;
+#endif
 	long len_lazy;
 	u8 enabled;
 	u8 offloaded;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
index 92968b856593..ff431cc83037 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
@@ -23,6 +23,19 @@ void rcu_cblist_init(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 	rclp->len_lazy = 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Enqueue an rcu_head structure onto the specified callback list.
+ * This function assumes that the callback is non-lazy because it
+ * is intended for use by no-CBs CPUs, which do not distinguish
+ * between lazy and non-lazy RCU callbacks.
+ */
+void rcu_cblist_enqueue(struct rcu_cblist *rclp, struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+	*rclp->tail = rhp;
+	rclp->tail = &rhp->next;
+	WRITE_ONCE(rclp->len, rclp->len + 1);
+}
+
 /*
  * Dequeue the oldest rcu_head structure from the specified callback
  * list.  This function assumes that the callback is non-lazy, but
@@ -44,6 +57,67 @@ struct rcu_head *rcu_cblist_dequeue(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 	return rhp;
 }
 
+/* Set the length of an rcu_segcblist structure. */
+void rcu_segcblist_set_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+	atomic_long_set(&rsclp->len, v);
+#else
+	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, v);
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * Increase the numeric length of an rcu_segcblist structure by the
+ * specified amount, which can be negative.  This can cause the ->len
+ * field to disagree with the actual number of callbacks on the structure.
+ * This increase is fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses
+ * both before and after.
+ */
+void rcu_segcblist_add_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+	smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* Up to the caller! */
+	atomic_long_add(v, &rsclp->len);
+	smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* Up to the caller! */
+#else
+	smp_mb(); /* Up to the caller! */
+	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + v);
+	smp_mb(); /* Up to the caller! */
+#endif
+}
+
+/*
+ * Increase the numeric length of an rcu_segcblist structure by one.
+ * This can cause the ->len field to disagree with the actual number of
+ * callbacks on the structure.  This increase is fully ordered with respect
+ * to the callers accesses both before and after.
+ */
+void rcu_segcblist_inc_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
+{
+	rcu_segcblist_add_len(rsclp, 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Exchange the numeric length of the specified rcu_segcblist structure
+ * with the specified value.  This can cause the ->len field to disagree
+ * with the actual number of callbacks on the structure.  This exchange is
+ * fully ordered with respect to the callers accesses both before and after.
+ */
+long rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, long v)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+	return atomic_long_xchg(&rsclp->len, v);
+#else
+	long ret = rsclp->len;
+
+	smp_mb(); /* Up to the caller! */
+	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, v);
+	smp_mb(); /* Up to the caller! */
+	return ret;
+#endif
+}
+
 /*
  * Initialize an rcu_segcblist structure.
  */
@@ -56,7 +130,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_init(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 	rsclp->head = NULL;
 	for (i = 0; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++)
 		rsclp->tails[i] = &rsclp->head;
-	rsclp->len = 0;
+	rcu_segcblist_set_len(rsclp, 0);
 	rsclp->len_lazy = 0;
 	rsclp->enabled = 1;
 }
@@ -151,7 +225,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_nextgp(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, unsigned long *lp)
 void rcu_segcblist_enqueue(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
 			   struct rcu_head *rhp, bool lazy)
 {
-	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + 1); /* ->len sampled locklessly. */
+	rcu_segcblist_inc_len(rsclp);
 	if (lazy)
 		rsclp->len_lazy++;
 	smp_mb(); /* Ensure counts are updated before callback is enqueued. */
@@ -177,7 +251,7 @@ bool rcu_segcblist_entrain(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
 
 	if (rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) == 0)
 		return false;
-	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + 1);
+	rcu_segcblist_inc_len(rsclp);
 	if (lazy)
 		rsclp->len_lazy++;
 	smp_mb(); /* Ensure counts are updated before callback is entrained. */
@@ -204,9 +278,8 @@ void rcu_segcblist_extract_count(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
 					       struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 {
 	rclp->len_lazy += rsclp->len_lazy;
-	rclp->len += rsclp->len;
 	rsclp->len_lazy = 0;
-	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, 0); /* ->len sampled locklessly. */
+	rclp->len = rcu_segcblist_xchg_len(rsclp, 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -259,8 +332,7 @@ void rcu_segcblist_insert_count(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp,
 				struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
 {
 	rsclp->len_lazy += rclp->len_lazy;
-	/* ->len sampled locklessly. */
-	WRITE_ONCE(rsclp->len, rsclp->len + rclp->len);
+	rcu_segcblist_add_len(rsclp, rclp->len);
 	rclp->len_lazy = 0;
 	rclp->len = 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
index db38f0a512c4..1ff996647d3c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@
 
 #include <linux/rcu_segcblist.h>
 
+/* Return number of callbacks in the specified callback list. */
+static inline long rcu_cblist_n_cbs(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(rclp->len);
+}
+
 /*
  * Account for the fact that a previously dequeued callback turned out
  * to be marked as lazy.
@@ -42,7 +48,11 @@ static inline bool rcu_segcblist_empty(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 /* Return number of callbacks in segmented callback list. */
 static inline long rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
+	return atomic_long_read(&rsclp->len);
+#else
 	return READ_ONCE(rsclp->len);
+#endif
 }
 
 /* Return number of lazy callbacks in segmented callback list. */
@@ -54,7 +64,7 @@ static inline long rcu_segcblist_n_lazy_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 /* Return number of lazy callbacks in segmented callback list. */
 static inline long rcu_segcblist_n_nonlazy_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
 {
-	return rsclp->len - rsclp->len_lazy;
+	return rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(rsclp) - rsclp->len_lazy;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-02 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 15:14 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] No-CBs bypass addition for v5.4 Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-08-04 14:50   ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-04 14:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-04 18:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-04 18:42     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-07  0:03   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-07  0:16     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-07  0:35     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-07  0:40       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-07  1:17         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-07  1:24           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-07  3:47             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu/nocb: EXP Check use and usefulness of ->nocb_lock_contended Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu/nocb: Print no-CBs diagnostics when rcutorture writer unduly delayed Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu/nocb: Avoid synchronous wakeup in __call_rcu_nocb_wake() Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu/nocb: Advance CBs after merge in rcutree_migrate_callbacks() Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu/nocb: Reduce nocb_cb_wait() leaf rcu_node ->lock contention Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu/nocb: Reduce __call_rcu_nocb_wake() " Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu/nocb: Don't wake no-CBs GP kthread if timer posted under overload Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Allow rcu_do_batch() to dynamically adjust batch sizes Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/14] EXP nohz: Add TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:14 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu/nohz: Force on tick when invoking lots of callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:15 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcutorture: Force on tick for readers and callback flooders Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-02 15:15 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-04 14:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-04 14:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-04 18:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-04 20:24         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-05  4:19           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-05  8:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-05 14:47               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-05  8:05         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-05 14:54           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-05 15:50             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-05 17:48               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-06 18:08                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-07 21:41                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-08 20:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-08 21:30                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-09 16:51                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-09 18:07                           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-09 18:39                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 21:02   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-12 23:23     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13  1:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13 12:30       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-13 14:48         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-14 17:55           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-14 22:05             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 15:07               ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 17:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 18:15                   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 18:39                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 19:42                       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13 21:06       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190802151501.13069-1-paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).