From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org
Subject: Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:34:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815213412.GB225926@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190815212756.GA225926@google.com>
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:27:56PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:22:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:31:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:04:32PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:17:14AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 09:02:49PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:01:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ . . . ]
> > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > index 8c494a692728..ad906d6a74fb 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > @@ -651,6 +651,12 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
> > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > if (rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1) {
> > > > > > > trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("--="), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting - 2, rdp->dynticks);
> > > > > > > + if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(rdp->cpu) &&
> > > > > > > + rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 2 &&
> > > > > > > + rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick) {
> > > > > > > + rdp->rcu_forced_tick = true;
> > > > > > > + tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU);
> > > > > > > + }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Instead of checking dynticks_nmi_nesting == 2 in rcu_nmi_exit_common(), can
> > > > > > we do the tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU) from
> > > > > > rcu_nmi_enter_common() ? We could add this code there, under the "if
> > > > > > (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs())".
> > > > >
> > > > > This would need to go in an "else" clause, correct? But there would still
> > > > > want to be a check for interrupt from base level (which would admittedly
> > > > > be an equality comparison with zero) and we would also still need to check
> > > > > for rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick.
> > > >
> > > > True, agreed. I replied to this before saying it should be
> > > > !rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() in the "if" ;) But it seems I could also be
> > > > missing the check for TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU in my tree so I think we need this as
> > > > well which is below as diff. Testing it more now!
> > > >
> > > > And, with this I do get many more ticks during the test. But there are
> > > > intervals where the tick is not seen. Still it is much better than before:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > index be9707f68024..e697c7a2ce67 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ static bool check_tick_dependency(atomic_t *dep)
> > > > return true;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + if (val & TICK_DEP_MASK_CLOCK_RCU) {
> > > > + return true;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > return false;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > That one is not in my tree, either. Frederic, should I add this to
> > > your patch? For that matter, may I add your Signed-off-by as well?
> > > Your original is in my -rcu tree at:
> > >
> > > 0cb41806c799 ("EXP nohz: Add TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU")
> > >
> > > I am testing Joel's suggested addition now.
> >
> > Actually there's more addition needed! I found another thing missing:
> >
> > There's a per-cpu &tick_dep_mask and a per-cpu ts->tick_dep_mask. It seems
> > RCU is setting the latter.
> >
> > So I added a check for both, below is the diff:
> >
> > However, I see in some cases that the tick_dep_mask is just 0 but I have to
> > debug that tomorrow if that's an issue on the RCU side of things. For now,
> > below should be the completed Frederick patch which you could squash into his
> > if he's Ok with it:
> >
> > ---8<-----------------------
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> > index f92a10b5e112..3f476e2a4bf7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
> > TICK_DEP_BIT_POSIX_TIMER = 0,
> > TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS = 1,
> > TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED = 2,
> > - TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE = 3
> > + TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE = 3,
> > + TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU = 4
> > };
> >
> > #define TICK_DEP_MASK_NONE 0
> > @@ -116,6 +117,7 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
> > #define TICK_DEP_MASK_PERF_EVENTS (1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS)
> > #define TICK_DEP_MASK_SCHED (1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED)
> > #define TICK_DEP_MASK_CLOCK_UNSTABLE (1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE)
> > +#define TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU (1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> > extern bool tick_nohz_enabled;
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index be9707f68024..a613916cc3f0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static bool check_tick_dependency(atomic_t *dep)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > + if (val & TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU) {
> > + trace_tick_stop(0, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> > +
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -208,8 +213,13 @@ static bool can_stop_full_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
> > if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu)))
> > return false;
> >
> > - if (check_tick_dependency(&tick_dep_mask))
> > + if (check_tick_dependency(&ts->tick_dep_mask)) {
> > return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (check_tick_dependency(&tick_dep_mask)) {
> > + return false;
> > + }
> >
> > if (check_tick_dependency(&ts->tick_dep_mask))
> > return false;
>
> Ah, I was being silly... this is already taken care off here. So you could
> just drop this hunk and keep the other hunks.
Sorry for the noise, to truly prevent the tick from getting turned off, I had
to do something like the following, it is a complete hack but it worked well
for me. I will debug this more and try to come up with a better solution
tomorrow:
---8<-----------------------
From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH] HACK: Force tick to not turn off if RCU is in urgent need of QS report
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 12 ++++++++++++
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 15 +++++++++++----
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a86c3c705e4d..60f81e151538 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ static long rcu_get_n_cbs_cpu(int cpu)
return rcu_get_n_cbs_nocb_cpu(rdp); /* Works for offline, too. */
}
+int rdp_nhq(void) {
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+ return !!rdp->rcu_need_heavy_qs;
+}
+
+int rdp_uq(void) {
+ struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+ return !!rdp->rcu_urgent_qs;
+}
+
void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
{
rcu_qs();
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index b14fc72c3b31..40df90222e34 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -851,6 +851,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
}
+int rdp_nhq(void);
+int rdp_uq(void);
+
static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
@@ -862,14 +865,18 @@ static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
return;
- if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts)) {
- trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: need_heavy_qs=%d urgent_qs=%d\n", rdp_nhq(), rdp_uq());
- trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: tick_dep_rcu=%d\n",
- (atomic_read(&ts->tick_dep_mask) | TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU));
+ if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts) && !rdp_nhq() && !rdp_uq()) {
+#if 0
+ trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: need_heavy_qs=%d urgent_qs=%d\n", );
+ trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: tick_dep_rcu=%d , ts %lu\n",
+ (atomic_read(&ts->tick_dep_mask) & TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU), (unsigned long)(&ts->tick_dep_mask));
+#endif
tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
}
else if (ts->tick_stopped) {
+#if 0
trace_printk("restarting sched-tick\n");
+#endif
tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, ktime_get());
}
#endif
--
2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-15 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-11 18:08 need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 18:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 21:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 21:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 1:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 1:40 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 3:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 21:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 3:21 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 3:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 21:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 23:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13 1:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13 1:05 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13 2:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13 2:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13 2:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 20:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 20:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 21:22 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 21:27 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 21:34 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-08-15 21:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 21:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-16 0:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-19 12:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 12:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 16:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 22:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190815213412.GB225926@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).