rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org
Subject: Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:34:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190815213412.GB225926@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190815212756.GA225926@google.com>

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:27:56PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 05:22:16PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:31:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:04:32PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:17:14AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 09:02:49PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:01:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [ . . . ]
> > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > index 8c494a692728..ad906d6a74fb 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > > > > > > @@ -651,6 +651,12 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_exit_common(bool irq)
> > > > > > >  	 */
> > > > > > >  	if (rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting != 1) {
> > > > > > >  		trace_rcu_dyntick(TPS("--="), rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting, rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting - 2, rdp->dynticks);
> > > > > > > +		if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(rdp->cpu) &&
> > > > > > > +		    rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting == 2 &&
> > > > > > > +		    rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick) {
> > > > > > > +			rdp->rcu_forced_tick = true;
> > > > > > > +			tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU);
> > > > > > > +		}
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Instead of checking dynticks_nmi_nesting == 2 in rcu_nmi_exit_common(), can
> > > > > > we do the tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU)  from
> > > > > > rcu_nmi_enter_common() ? We could add this code there, under the "if
> > > > > > (rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs())".
> > > > > 
> > > > > This would need to go in an "else" clause, correct?  But there would still
> > > > > want to be a check for interrupt from base level (which would admittedly
> > > > > be an equality comparison with zero) and we would also still need to check
> > > > > for rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick.
> > > > 
> > > > True, agreed. I replied to this before saying it should be
> > > > !rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs() in the "if" ;) But it seems I could also be
> > > > missing the check for TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU in my tree so I think we need this as
> > > > well which is below as diff. Testing it more now!
> > > > 
> > > > And, with this I do get many more ticks during the test. But there are
> > > > intervals where the tick is not seen. Still it is much better than before:
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > index be9707f68024..e697c7a2ce67 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > > > @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ static bool check_tick_dependency(atomic_t *dep)
> > > >  		return true;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (val & TICK_DEP_MASK_CLOCK_RCU) {
> > > > +		return true;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > >  	return false;
> > > >  }
> > > 
> > > That one is not in my tree, either.  Frederic, should I add this to
> > > your patch?  For that matter, may I add your Signed-off-by as well?
> > > Your original is in my -rcu tree at:
> > > 
> > > 0cb41806c799 ("EXP nohz: Add TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU")
> > > 
> > > I am testing Joel's suggested addition now.
> > 
> > Actually there's more addition needed! I found another thing missing:
> > 
> > There's a per-cpu &tick_dep_mask and a per-cpu ts->tick_dep_mask. It seems
> > RCU is setting the latter.
> > 
> > So I added a check for both, below is the diff:
> > 
> > However, I see in some cases that the tick_dep_mask is just 0 but I have to
> > debug that tomorrow if that's an issue on the RCU side of things. For now,
> > below should be the completed Frederick patch which you could squash into his
> > if he's Ok with it:
> > 
> > ---8<-----------------------
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> > index f92a10b5e112..3f476e2a4bf7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> > @@ -108,7 +108,8 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
> >  	TICK_DEP_BIT_POSIX_TIMER	= 0,
> >  	TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS	= 1,
> >  	TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED		= 2,
> > -	TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE	= 3
> > +	TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE	= 3,
> > +	TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU		= 4
> >  };
> >  
> >  #define TICK_DEP_MASK_NONE		0
> > @@ -116,6 +117,7 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
> >  #define TICK_DEP_MASK_PERF_EVENTS	(1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_PERF_EVENTS)
> >  #define TICK_DEP_MASK_SCHED		(1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED)
> >  #define TICK_DEP_MASK_CLOCK_UNSTABLE	(1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE)
> > +#define TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU		(1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU)
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> >  extern bool tick_nohz_enabled;
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index be9707f68024..a613916cc3f0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static bool check_tick_dependency(atomic_t *dep)
> >  		return true;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (val & TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU) {
> > +		trace_tick_stop(0, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU);
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -208,8 +213,13 @@ static bool can_stop_full_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
> >  	if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu)))
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	if (check_tick_dependency(&tick_dep_mask))
> > +	if (check_tick_dependency(&ts->tick_dep_mask)) {
> >  		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (check_tick_dependency(&tick_dep_mask)) {
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	if (check_tick_dependency(&ts->tick_dep_mask))
> >  		return false;
> 
> Ah, I was being silly... this is already taken care off here. So you could
> just drop this hunk and keep the other hunks.

Sorry for the noise, to truly prevent the tick from getting turned off, I had
to do something like the following, it is a complete hack but it worked well
for me. I will debug this more and try to come up with a better solution
tomorrow:

---8<-----------------------

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: [PATCH] HACK: Force tick to not turn off if RCU is in urgent need of QS report

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 12 ++++++++++++
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index a86c3c705e4d..60f81e151538 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ static long rcu_get_n_cbs_cpu(int cpu)
 	return rcu_get_n_cbs_nocb_cpu(rdp); /* Works for offline, too. */
 }
 
+int rdp_nhq(void) {
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+	return !!rdp->rcu_need_heavy_qs;
+}
+
+int  rdp_uq(void) {
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+	return !!rdp->rcu_urgent_qs;
+}
+
 void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
 {
 	rcu_qs();
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index b14fc72c3b31..40df90222e34 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -851,6 +851,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
 	tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
 }
 
+int rdp_nhq(void);
+int  rdp_uq(void);
+
 static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
@@ -862,14 +865,18 @@ static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
 	if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
 		return;
 
-	if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts)) {
-		trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: need_heavy_qs=%d urgent_qs=%d\n", rdp_nhq(), rdp_uq());
-		trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: tick_dep_rcu=%d\n",
-				(atomic_read(&ts->tick_dep_mask) | TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU));
+	if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts) && !rdp_nhq() && !rdp_uq()) {
+#if 0
+		trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: need_heavy_qs=%d urgent_qs=%d\n", );
+		trace_printk("stopping sched-tick: tick_dep_rcu=%d , ts %lu\n",
+				(atomic_read(&ts->tick_dep_mask) & TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU), (unsigned long)(&ts->tick_dep_mask));
+#endif
 		tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
 	}
 	else if (ts->tick_stopped) {
+#if 0
 		trace_printk("restarting sched-tick\n");
+#endif
 		tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, ktime_get());
 	}
 #endif
-- 
2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-15 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-11 18:08 need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 18:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 21:16   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 21:25     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-11 23:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12  1:24         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12  1:40           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12  3:57             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 21:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12  3:21   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12  3:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 21:20       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 23:01         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13  1:02           ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13  1:05             ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-13  2:28               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13  2:27             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-13  2:50               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 17:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 20:04               ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 20:31                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 21:22                   ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 21:27                     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-15 21:34                       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-08-15 21:57                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-15 21:45                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-16  0:02                       ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-19 12:34                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 12:09                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 16:57                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-08-19 22:31                     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190815213412.GB225926@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).