From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475BFC3A59E for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5FB206DD for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726464AbfHXSIx (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:53 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:11560 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726390AbfHXSIx (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7OI6i1q029107; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:39 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uk1r8uana-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:39 -0400 Received: from m0098394.ppops.net (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7OI8Y7A045088; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:38 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uk1r8uamy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:08:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7OI59ow014846; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:37 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2ujvv63xjd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:37 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7OI8af436700582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:36 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9076B2073; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6900B205F; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.85.187.121]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 18:08:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB3CD16C65C7; Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 06:32:04 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, parri.andrea@gmail.com, byungchul.park@lge.com, peterz@infradead.org, mojha@codeaurora.org, ice_yangxiao@163.com, efremov@linux.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4 Message-ID: <20190824133204.GT28441@linux.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20190822151811.GA8894@linux.ibm.com> <20190822185429.GA110910@gmail.com> <20190822192132.GJ28441@linux.ibm.com> <20190824120102.GA10758@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190824120102.GA10758@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-24_11:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908240201 Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:54:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > [ . . . ] > > > > > Pulled into tip:core/rcu, thanks a lot Paul! > > > > Thank you! > > > > > The merge commit is a bit non-standard: > > > > > > 07f038a408fb: Merge LKMM and RCU commits > > > > > > but clear enough IMHO. Usually we try to keep this format: > > > > > > 6c06b66e957c: Merge branch 'X' into Y > > > > > > even for internal merge commits. > > > > Please accept my apologies! How about as shown below? If this works > > for you, I will rebase my development commits on top this merge commit > > in order to make sure I don't revert back to my old format for next > > merge window. > > Looks good - but I don't think we should create a new merge commit just > for this. Ah, right -- I need to keep my development commits on top of the old merge commit to enable the likely additional pull request that I mentioned below. Good point! ;-) Thanx, Paul > > Ah, speaking of reminding me... There is likely to be one more small RCU > > commit requested by the RISC-V guys. If testing and review goes well, > > I will send you a pull request for it by the middle of next week. > > Thanks! > > Ingo