From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Wolfgang M. Reimer" <linuxball@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/9] locking: locktorture: Do not include rwlock.h directly
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 18:47:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003014728.13496-8-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191003014710.GA13323@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From: "Wolfgang M. Reimer" <linuxball@gmail.com>
Including rwlock.h directly will cause kernel builds to fail
if CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is defined. The correct header file
(rwlock_rt.h OR rwlock.h) will be included by spinlock.h which
is included by locktorture.c anyway.
Remove the include of linux/rwlock.h.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang M. Reimer <linuxball@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 8dd9002..99475a6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/rwlock.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-03 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-03 1:47 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Torture-test updates Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Remove unused function rcutorture_record_progress() paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/9] locktorture: Replace strncmp() with str_has_prefix() paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcutorture: Remove CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n from scenarios paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/9] rcutorture: Emulate dyntick aspect of userspace nohz_full sojourn paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/9] rcu: Remove unused variable rcu_perf_writer_state paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] rcutorture: Separate warnings for each failure type paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/9] rcutorture: Make in-kernel-loop testing more brutal paulmck
2019-10-03 1:47 ` paulmck [this message]
2019-10-03 1:47 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 9/9] rcu: Suppress levelspread uninitialized messages paulmck
2019-10-03 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-10-05 16:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191003014728.13496-8-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxball@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).