From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8052DCA9ECB for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CBB2086D for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:10:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572531058; bh=fVcJ1YoHP/ebgQ+YPr6vqVO+Ngjo3zOd7mH3hAZcT+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID: From; b=ez1FHX7KqV7RNC2Hoqy5GxNlq3U/0JQi2mTW4sCGIPa1mwlpNdqLGzSYU0iUZ9v/S mtw26UkK5tIpb+7xMHm+HeoeaEzxgOI/Hm6i7veyHpVyEZjHVPMrG5zYju/jUMhEGD ShlUO+iLSiemruv75f+aMJopHFRROfFOdEjSqcwc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726765AbfJaOK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:10:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50720 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726506AbfJaOK5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:10:57 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 114352080F; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 14:10:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1572531057; bh=fVcJ1YoHP/ebgQ+YPr6vqVO+Ngjo3zOd7mH3hAZcT+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lP06XwrLn3KR3FJCfDPcInfOUe/R4MEnV5PxQyqOCo9oKtgUb4HGqpX0wx9YJf5Sy q39pJht5ZhQOMaSqnpUEHoCJxlb/C7ABB8vfO4sy5CH2GaEaigj8vGOSll+xRzLgKm TTAXtLEufUpJBcegc+8WdQwkaXe+w9sKJ8Spe9ec= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C437A3520744; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 07:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 07:10:56 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Lai Jiangshan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , rcu@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] rcu: cleanup rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() Message-ID: <20191031141056.GR20975@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <20191031100806.1326-1-laijs@linux.alibaba.com> <20191031100806.1326-5-laijs@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191031100806.1326-5-laijs@linux.alibaba.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:07:59AM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Don't need to set ->rcu_read_lock_nesting negative, irq-protected > rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() doesn't expect > ->rcu_read_lock_nesting to be negative to work, it even > doesn't access to ->rcu_read_lock_nesting any more. > > It is true that NMI over rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() > may access to ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, but it is still safe > since rcu_read_unlock_special() can protect itself from NMI. Hmmm... Testing identified the need for this one. But I will wait for your responses on the earlier patches before going any further through this series. Thanx, Paul > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan > --- > kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > index 82595db04eec..9fe8138ed3c3 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h > @@ -555,16 +555,11 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t) > static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t) > { > unsigned long flags; > - bool couldrecurse = t->rcu_read_lock_nesting >= 0; > > if (!rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t)) > return; > - if (couldrecurse) > - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting -= RCU_NEST_BIAS; > local_irq_save(flags); > rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags); > - if (couldrecurse) > - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting += RCU_NEST_BIAS; > } > > /* > -- > 2.20.1 >