From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F19C43331 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130D820774 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:25:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585347900; bh=AbHzCq/ipvxYg03IOnh2qoQJ9OKD4rtZm+KGxOfTrN8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=TmUGCqAd8vrgRWhhk66E2uTT2HQt2gNOFDOaUWjiD1al7R63KzZauq4qQBO51EdTI Axg4flJ4euWcq542I8OfjtFU2tDXtG1LaP3UVZhwpB8Gvo41kTgOuVPChU6vbfin5y qsPwASXTRVxGqpu8hBTrjQO4fKw4EzeZuyWrjvLQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727702AbgC0WY7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:24:59 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42528 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727655AbgC0WY7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:24:59 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81AE72074A; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:24:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1585347898; bh=AbHzCq/ipvxYg03IOnh2qoQJ9OKD4rtZm+KGxOfTrN8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IC5moYkei5dZ1wiSq/o7J0l4Cdsqm4//zp/FLfQ63sbC5S4R7bJj9hI/945WHoopH 2r3ksuPGMe6K/wRKoh1lUe9NgdFKMW0Wc7KsgBb6HYj77irMWJPrjZa55nXU91g26v f2+8PUGYWW7kS6U2mrUw+wTzdG1ogM0iO7qHfkmA= From: paulmck@kernel.org To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 02/34] rcu: Add per-task state to RCU CPU stall warnings Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:24:24 -0700 Message-Id: <20200327222456.12470-2-paulmck@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.5 In-Reply-To: <20200327222346.GA12082@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> References: <20200327222346.GA12082@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org From: "Paul E. McKenney" Currently, an RCU-preempt CPU stall warning simply lists the PIDs of those tasks holding up the current grace period. This can be helpful, but more can be even more helpful. To this end, this commit adds the nesting level, whether the task thinks it was preempted in its current RCU read-side critical section, whether RCU core has asked this task for a quiescent state, whether the expedited-grace-period hint is set, and whether the task believes that it is on the blocked-tasks list (it must be, or it would not be printed, but if things are broken, best not to take too much for granted). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h index 502b4dd..e19487d 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h @@ -192,14 +192,40 @@ static void rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp) raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); } +// Communicate task state back to the RCU CPU stall warning request. +struct rcu_stall_chk_rdr { + int nesting; + union rcu_special rs; + bool on_blkd_list; +}; + +/* + * Report out the state of a not-running task that is stalling the + * current RCU grace period. + */ +static bool check_slow_task(struct task_struct *t, void *arg) +{ + struct rcu_node *rnp; + struct rcu_stall_chk_rdr *rscrp = arg; + + if (task_curr(t)) + return false; // It is running, so decline to inspect it. + rscrp->nesting = t->rcu_read_lock_nesting; + rscrp->rs = t->rcu_read_unlock_special; + rnp = t->rcu_blocked_node; + rscrp->on_blkd_list = !list_empty(&t->rcu_node_entry); + return true; +} + /* * Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical * sections, printing out the tid of each. */ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp) { - struct task_struct *t; int ndetected = 0; + struct rcu_stall_chk_rdr rscr; + struct task_struct *t; if (!rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) return 0; @@ -208,7 +234,15 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp) t = list_entry(rnp->gp_tasks->prev, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry); list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) { - pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid); + if (!try_invoke_on_locked_down_task(t, check_slow_task, &rscr)) + pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid); + else + pr_cont(" P%d/%d:%c%c%c%c", + t->pid, rscr.nesting, + ".b"[rscr.rs.b.blocked], + ".q"[rscr.rs.b.need_qs], + ".e"[rscr.rs.b.exp_hint], + ".l"[rscr.on_blkd_list]); ndetected++; } pr_cont("\n"); -- 2.9.5