From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:34:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618213427.GV2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618211709.GA17263@pc636>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:17:09PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback(
> > > rcu_state.name, bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > if (i == 0)
> > > kfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > else
> > > vfree_bulk(bkvhead[i]->nr_records,
> > > bkvhead[i]->records);
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Matthew, what is your thought?
> >
> > That was my thinking too. If we had a kvfree_bulk(), I would expect it to
> > handle a mixture of vfree and kfree, but you've segregated them already.
> > So I think this is better.
> >
> Yes, the segregation is done. Having vfree_bulk() is enough then.
> We are on the same page :)
Very good. When does kfree_rcu() and friends move out of kernel/rcu?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-25 21:47 [PATCH v2 00/16] Introduce kvfree_rcu(1 or 2 arguments) Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] rcu/tree: Keep kfree_rcu() awake during lock contention Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] rcu/tree: Skip entry into the page allocator for PREEMPT_RT Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] rcu/tree: Repeat the monitor if any free channel is busy Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] rcu/tree: Make debug_objects logic independent of rcu_head Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] rcu/tree: Simplify KFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR macro Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] rcu/tree: Move kfree_rcu_cpu locking/unlocking to separate functions Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] rcu/tree: Use static initializer for krc.lock Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] rcu/tree: Maintain separate array for vmalloc ptrs Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-06-17 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 0:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 3:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 18:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 19:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 20:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 20:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 21:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 21:34 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-06-19 15:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-19 16:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-22 19:04 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-22 19:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-30 17:46 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 20:03 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 17:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:23 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-06-18 18:37 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-06-18 18:48 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] rcu/tiny: support vmalloc in tiny-RCU Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] rcu: Rename *_kfree_callback/*_kfree_rcu_offset/kfree_call_* Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] rcu: Introduce 2 arg kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] rcu: Support reclaim for head-less object Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] rcu: Introduce single argument kvfree_rcu() interface Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2020-05-25 21:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] lib/test_vmalloc.c: Add test cases for kvfree_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618213427.GV2723@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).