rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com
To: paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, frextrite@gmail.com,
	Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rculist : Introduce list/hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() macros
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2020 19:38:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703140828.7016-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>

list/hlist_for_each_entry_rcu() provides an optional cond argument
to specify the lock held in the updater side.
However for SRCU read side, not providing the cond argument results
into false positive as whether srcu_read_lock is held or not is not
checked implicitly. Therefore, on read side the lockdep expression
srcu_read_lock_held(srcu struct) can solve this issue.

However, the function still fails to check the cases where srcu
protected list is traversed with rcu_read_lock() instead of
srcu_read_lock(). Therefore, to remove the false negative,
this patch introduces two new list traversal primitives :
list_for_each_entry_srcu() and hlist_for_each_entry_srcu().

Both of the functions have non-optional cond argument
as it is required for both read and update side, and simply checks
if the cond is true.

Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/rculist.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index df587d181844..04a7e5791c39 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -63,9 +63,17 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(struct list_head *list)
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(cond) && !rcu_read_lock_any_held(),		\
 			 "RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!");	\
 	})
+
+#define __list_check_srcu(cond)					 \
+	({								 \
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!(cond),					 \
+		"RCU-list traversed without holding the required lock!");\
+	})
 #else
 #define __list_check_rcu(dummy, cond, extra...)				\
 	({ check_arg_count_one(extra); })
+
+#define __list_check_srcu(cond)
 #endif
 
 /*
@@ -383,6 +391,23 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
 		&pos->member != (head);					\
 		pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
 
+/**
+ * list_for_each_entry_srcu	-	iterate over rcu list of given type
+ * @pos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
+ * @head:	the head for your list.
+ * @member:	the name of the list_head within the struct.
+ * @cond:	lockdep expression for the lock required to traverse the list.
+ *
+ * This list-traversal primitive may safely run concurrently with
+ * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu()
+ * as long as the traversal is guarded by srcu_read_lock().
+ */
+#define list_for_each_entry_srcu(pos, head, member, cond)		\
+	for (__list_check_srcu(cond),					\
+	     pos = list_entry_rcu((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member);	\
+		&pos->member != (head);					\
+		pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
+
 /**
  * list_entry_lockless - get the struct for this entry
  * @ptr:        the &struct list_head pointer.
@@ -681,6 +706,25 @@ static inline void hlist_add_behind_rcu(struct hlist_node *n,
 		pos = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_next_rcu(\
 			&(pos)->member)), typeof(*(pos)), member))
 
+/**
+ * hlist_for_each_entry_srcu - iterate over rcu list of given type
+ * @pos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
+ * @head:	the head for your list.
+ * @member:	the name of the hlist_node within the struct.
+ * @cond:	lockdep expression for the lock required to traverse the list.
+ *
+ * This list-traversal primitive may safely run concurrently with
+ * the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as hlist_add_head_rcu()
+ * as long as the traversal is guarded by srcu_read_lock().
+ */
+#define hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(pos, head, member, cond)		\
+	for (__list_check_srcu(cond),					\
+	     pos = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_first_rcu(head)),\
+			typeof(*(pos)), member);			\
+		pos;							\
+		pos = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_next_rcu(\
+			&(pos)->member)), typeof(*(pos)), member))
+
 /**
  * hlist_for_each_entry_rcu_notrace - iterate over rcu list of given type (for tracing)
  * @pos:	the type * to use as a loop cursor.
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 14:08 madhuparnabhowmik10 [this message]
2020-07-08 12:33 ` [PATCH] rculist : Introduce list/hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() macros joel
2020-07-09 17:06   ` Madhuparna Bhowmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200703140828.7016-1-madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com \
    --to=madhuparnabhowmik10@gmail.com \
    --cc=frextrite@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).