From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC06DC433E1 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B4420639 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SqxwybX4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726701AbgHRQAW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:00:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35766 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726793AbgHRPpN (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 11:45:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3934C061389; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id v12so21953056ljc.10; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DhzM7vDeu30fKWxKCWsmI+9HmQeO+RMonyIvtC+hDwA=; b=SqxwybX42CIGvNAoGhhjU+9JlLP/BC7Mga9LqZvCW/UUWMQ6DQSFFa1MIbfeTOax4O 4gX/tWloNniS8fMgJSpgVre6Pz+rR4IvOSIJ+3hTy0a4yWfh/rDbOa+c7oLqKdGAwPP/ pXR2kOlWGuh9QgyoaZFEbT4Y9pRSWJbjLj18QlhAVxnZiK3nOKx+Uq+D+XWgaFGTLv5i F+hwCGQ4sGgDITHAujFewbSoP1xC0Am1kMysavPQ+Y3b4cgFXVcRVMHGm3QWJreTCaFF lFlyZ6Ahc65JNW0TcoEK5pafoZxs1wyQIpACb5OIo59grcOhxh5w6eqnkBphPe3kbc9P 7sTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DhzM7vDeu30fKWxKCWsmI+9HmQeO+RMonyIvtC+hDwA=; b=hM2gTyc3gEt78h/fLw8dUMEl/BF7yRWQoN2d7Wi2ZxUNAMUdI3PIP2Oj9qCgYWRsgt SB8QSxA+GNfJZFD3/Qpqkh5HXNQ+0gpO3zwFaYkYFwW/rjIsoNh5K9XFnwYRQMdfXWId Y++Vwq1hohoXPR/BuvsGdMlPSqz4QbQrKqeDWqrXy/Xb92TV6j5N9FL14OPARjv+A10+ y/UzU4znq0JF9KO6i7mQ8r246riXZVh5cepJTQR7jcqZR5yz5knaGdD2Z4MRRKhY4UVY uURv2Y09zw4Zj3/7Bhf9PMyt4NL3BE63/8fBAEKLZDVv6e9vKAU7Vb1kArq8xCdLOaRn mc1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iLigdHR+EWFgKf+8waxispOrkQ+xZqxZ9GrJflDaX6xXNQPJN 3RDm02gcXgnxsLbk9PwJfI4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJ1cguy3j9aaGW5J2byMGBQhOG8Nq7ELvlaUyvvEcVjRM7knWKdu3qF9HJwcbWT83xOhyEAg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7006:: with SMTP id l6mr8585166ljc.107.1597765506138; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc636 (h5ef52e31.seluork.dyn.perspektivbredband.net. [94.245.46.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d13sm6624392lfl.89.2020.08.18.08.45.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 08:45:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Uladzislau Rezki X-Google-Original-From: Uladzislau Rezki Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 17:45:02 +0200 To: Michal Hocko Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Uladzislau Rezki , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , RCU , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , "Theodore Y . Ts'o" , Joel Fernandes , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Oleksiy Avramchenko Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag Message-ID: <20200818154502.GA32169@pc636> References: <20200814180224.GQ4295@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <875z9lkoo4.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200814204140.GT4295@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200814215206.GL3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200816225655.GA17869@pc636> <20200817082849.GA28270@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200817222803.GE23602@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200818074344.GL28270@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200818135327.GF23602@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> <20200818150232.GQ28270@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200818150232.GQ28270@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org Hello, Michal. You mentioned somewhere in the thread to show figures regarding hitting a fast path and "fallback one". We follow fallback when a page allocation fails. Please see below the plot. I hope it is easy to understand: wget ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/1000000_kfree_rcu_fast_hit_vs_fallback_hit.png to summarize. When i tight loop is applied, i.e. flood simulation the fallback hit is negligible. It is a noise, out of 1 000 000 we have 1% or %2 of fallback hitting. Thanks! -- Vlad Rezki