[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] SRCU updates for v5.12

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] SRCU updates for v5.12

[Paul E. McKenney]

Hello!

This series contains SRCU updates, most notably the polling grace-period
API requested by Kent Overstreet.

1.	Make Tiny SRCU use multi-bit grace-period counter.

2.	Provide internal interface to start a Tiny SRCU grace period.

3.	Provide internal interface to start a Tree SRCU grace period.

4.	Provide polling interfaces for Tiny SRCU grace periods.

5.	Provide polling interfaces for Tree SRCU grace periods.

6.	Document polling interfaces for Tree SRCU grace periods.

7.	Add comment explaining cookie overflow/wrap.

8.	Prepare for ->start_gp_poll and ->poll_gp_state.

9.	Add writer-side tests of polling grace-period API.

10.	Add reader-side tests of polling grace-period API.

						Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst |   18 ++
 include/linux/rcupdate.h                               |    2 
 include/linux/srcu.h                                   |    3 
 include/linux/srcutiny.h                               |    7 
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c                                |   99 +++++++++--
 kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c                                  |   77 +++++++-
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c                                  |  148 +++++++++++++----
 7 files changed, 296 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] srcu: Make Tiny SRCU use multi-bit grace-period counter

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace periods.  This
polling needs to distinguish between an SRCU instance being idle on the
one hand or in the middle of a grace period on the other.  This commit
therefore converts the Tiny SRCU srcu_struct structure's srcu_idx from
a defacto boolean to a free-running counter, using the bottom bit to
indicate that a grace period is in progress.  The second-from-bottom
bit is thus used as the index returned by srcu_read_lock().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
[ paulmck: Fix ->srcu_lock_nesting[] indexing per Neeraj Upadhyay. ]
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/srcutiny.h | 6 +++---
 kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c    | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/srcutiny.h b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
index 5a5a194..b8b42d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 struct srcu_struct {
 	short srcu_lock_nesting[2];	/* srcu_read_lock() nesting depth. */
-	short srcu_idx;			/* Current reader array element. */
+	unsigned short srcu_idx;	/* Current reader array element in bit 0x2. */
 	u8 srcu_gp_running;		/* GP workqueue running? */
 	u8 srcu_gp_waiting;		/* GP waiting for readers? */
 	struct swait_queue_head srcu_wq;
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
 	int idx;
 
-	idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx);
+	idx = ((READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) + 1) & 0x2) >> 1;
 	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx], ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx] + 1);
 	return idx;
 }
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static inline void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
 {
 	int idx;
 
-	idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1;
+	idx = ((READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) + 1) & 0x2) >> 1;
 	pr_alert("%s%s Tiny SRCU per-CPU(idx=%d): (%hd,%hd)\n",
 		 tt, tf, idx,
 		 READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[!idx]),
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 6208c1d..5598cf6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -124,11 +124,12 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 	ssp->srcu_cb_head = NULL;
 	ssp->srcu_cb_tail = &ssp->srcu_cb_head;
 	local_irq_enable();
-	idx = ssp->srcu_idx;
-	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, !ssp->srcu_idx);
+	idx = (ssp->srcu_idx & 0x2) / 2;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, ssp->srcu_idx + 1);
 	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting, true);  /* srcu_read_unlock() wakes! */
 	swait_event_exclusive(ssp->srcu_wq, !READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_lock_nesting[idx]));
 	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting, false); /* srcu_read_unlock() cheap. */
+	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, ssp->srcu_idx + 1);
 
 	/* Invoke the callbacks we removed above. */
 	while (lh) {
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] srcu: Provide internal interface to start a Tiny SRCU grace period

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace periods.
This polling needs to initiate an SRCU grace period without
having to queue (and manage) a callback.  This commit therefore
splits the Tiny SRCU call_srcu() function into callback-queuing and
start-grace-period portions, with the latter in a new function named
srcu_gp_start_if_needed().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 5598cf6..3bac1db 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -152,6 +152,16 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_drive_gp);
 
+static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+	if (!READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running)) {
+		if (likely(srcu_init_done))
+			schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
+		else if (list_empty(&ssp->srcu_work.entry))
+			list_add(&ssp->srcu_work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Enqueue an SRCU callback on the specified srcu_struct structure,
  * initiating grace-period processing if it is not already running.
@@ -167,12 +177,7 @@ void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 	*ssp->srcu_cb_tail = rhp;
 	ssp->srcu_cb_tail = &rhp->next;
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
-	if (!READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running)) {
-		if (likely(srcu_init_done))
-			schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
-		else if (list_empty(&ssp->srcu_work.entry))
-			list_add(&ssp->srcu_work.entry, &srcu_boot_list);
-	}
+	srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_srcu);
 
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] srcu: Provide internal interface to start a Tree SRCU grace period

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace periods.
This polling needs to initiate an SRCU grace period without having
to queue (and manage) a callback.  This commit therefore splits the
Tree SRCU __call_srcu() function into callback-initialization and
queuing/start-grace-period portions, with the latter in a new function
named srcu_gp_start_if_needed().  This function may be passed a NULL
callback pointer, in which case it will refrain from queuing anything.

Why have the new function mess with queuing?  Locking considerations,
of course!

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 0f23d20..9a7b650 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -808,6 +808,42 @@ static void srcu_leak_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Start an SRCU grace period, and also queue the callback if non-NULL.
+ */
+static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, bool do_norm)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int idx;
+	bool needexp = false;
+	bool needgp = false;
+	unsigned long s;
+	struct srcu_data *sdp;
+
+	idx = srcu_read_lock(ssp);
+	sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
+	spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
+	rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp);
+	rcu_segcblist_advance(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
+			      rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq));
+	s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
+	(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&sdp->srcu_cblist, s);
+	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, s)) {
+		sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed = s;
+		needgp = true;
+	}
+	if (!do_norm && ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, s)) {
+		sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = s;
+		needexp = true;
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
+	if (needgp)
+		srcu_funnel_gp_start(ssp, sdp, s, do_norm);
+	else if (needexp)
+		srcu_funnel_exp_start(ssp, sdp->mynode, s);
+	srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
+}
+
+/*
  * Enqueue an SRCU callback on the srcu_data structure associated with
  * the current CPU and the specified srcu_struct structure, initiating
  * grace-period processing if it is not already running.
@@ -838,13 +874,6 @@ static void srcu_leak_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 			rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int idx;
-	bool needexp = false;
-	bool needgp = false;
-	unsigned long s;
-	struct srcu_data *sdp;
-
 	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
 	if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
 		/* Probable double call_srcu(), so leak the callback. */
@@ -853,28 +882,7 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 		return;
 	}
 	rhp->func = func;
-	idx = srcu_read_lock(ssp);
-	sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
-	spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
-	rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp);
-	rcu_segcblist_advance(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
-			      rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq));
-	s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
-	(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&sdp->srcu_cblist, s);
-	if (ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, s)) {
-		sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed = s;
-		needgp = true;
-	}
-	if (!do_norm && ULONG_CMP_LT(sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, s)) {
-		sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = s;
-		needexp = true;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
-	if (needgp)
-		srcu_funnel_gp_start(ssp, sdp, s, do_norm);
-	else if (needexp)
-		srcu_funnel_exp_start(ssp, sdp->mynode, s);
-	srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
+	srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] srcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tiny SRCU grace periods

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace
periods, so this commit supplies get_state_synchronize_srcu(),
start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and poll_state_synchronize_srcu() for this
purpose.  The first can be used if future grace periods are inevitable
(perhaps due to a later call_srcu() invocation), the second if future
grace periods might not otherwise happen, and the third to check if a
grace period has elapsed since the corresponding call to either of the
first two.

As with get_state_synchronize_rcu() and cond_synchronize_rcu(),
the return value from either get_state_synchronize_srcu() or
start_poll_synchronize_srcu() must be passed in to a later call to
poll_state_synchronize_srcu().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
[ paulmck: Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() per kernel test robot feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Neeraj Upadhyay. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117004017.GA7444@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72/
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |  2 ++
 include/linux/srcu.h     |  3 +++
 include/linux/srcutiny.h |  1 +
 kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c    | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index de08264..e09c0d8 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
 #define ULONG_CMP_GE(a, b)	(ULONG_MAX / 2 >= (a) - (b))
 #define ULONG_CMP_LT(a, b)	(ULONG_MAX / 2 < (a) - (b))
 #define ulong2long(a)		(*(long *)(&(a)))
+#define USHORT_CMP_GE(a, b)	(USHRT_MAX / 2 >= (unsigned short)((a) - (b)))
+#define USHORT_CMP_LT(a, b)	(USHRT_MAX / 2 < (unsigned short)((a) - (b)))
 
 /* Exported common interfaces */
 void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func);
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index e432cc9..a0895bb 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
 int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp);
 void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) __releases(ssp);
 void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
+unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp);
+bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 
diff --git a/include/linux/srcutiny.h b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
index b8b42d0..0e0cf4d 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcutiny.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 struct srcu_struct {
 	short srcu_lock_nesting[2];	/* srcu_read_lock() nesting depth. */
 	unsigned short srcu_idx;	/* Current reader array element in bit 0x2. */
+	unsigned short srcu_idx_max;	/* Furthest future srcu_idx request. */
 	u8 srcu_gp_running;		/* GP workqueue running? */
 	u8 srcu_gp_waiting;		/* GP waiting for readers? */
 	struct swait_queue_head srcu_wq;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index 3bac1db..26344dc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	ssp->srcu_gp_running = false;
 	ssp->srcu_gp_waiting = false;
 	ssp->srcu_idx = 0;
+	ssp->srcu_idx_max = 0;
 	INIT_WORK(&ssp->srcu_work, srcu_drive_gp);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ssp->srcu_work.entry);
 	return 0;
@@ -84,6 +85,8 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_gp_waiting);
 	WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_cb_head);
 	WARN_ON(&ssp->srcu_cb_head != ssp->srcu_cb_tail);
+	WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_idx != ssp->srcu_idx_max);
+	WARN_ON(ssp->srcu_idx & 0x1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cleanup_srcu_struct);
 
@@ -114,7 +117,7 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 	struct srcu_struct *ssp;
 
 	ssp = container_of(wp, struct srcu_struct, srcu_work);
-	if (ssp->srcu_gp_running || !READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_cb_head))
+	if (ssp->srcu_gp_running || USHORT_CMP_GE(ssp->srcu_idx, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max)))
 		return; /* Already running or nothing to do. */
 
 	/* Remove recently arrived callbacks and wait for readers. */
@@ -147,13 +150,19 @@ void srcu_drive_gp(struct work_struct *wp)
 	 * straighten that out.
 	 */
 	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running, false);
-	if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_cb_head))
+	if (USHORT_CMP_LT(ssp->srcu_idx, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max)))
 		schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_drive_gp);
 
 static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 {
+	unsigned short cookie;
+
+	cookie = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
+	if (USHORT_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max), cookie))
+		return;
+	WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx_max, cookie);
 	if (!READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_running)) {
 		if (likely(srcu_init_done))
 			schedule_work(&ssp->srcu_work);
@@ -196,6 +205,48 @@ void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
 
+/*
+ * get_state_synchronize_srcu - Provide an end-of-grace-period cookie
+ */
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	barrier();
+	ret = (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) + 3) & ~0x1;
+	barrier();
+	return ret & USHRT_MAX;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_srcu);
+
+/*
+ * start_poll_synchronize_srcu - Provide cookie and start grace period
+ *
+ * The difference between this and get_state_synchronize_srcu() is that
+ * this function ensures that the poll_state_synchronize_srcu() will
+ * eventually return the value true.
+ */
+unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+	unsigned long ret = get_state_synchronize_srcu(ssp);
+
+	srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp);
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_srcu);
+
+/*
+ * poll_state_synchronize_srcu - Has cookie's grace period ended?
+ */
+bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie)
+{
+	bool ret = USHORT_CMP_GE(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx), cookie);
+
+	barrier();
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_srcu);
+
 /* Lockdep diagnostics.  */
 void __init rcu_scheduler_starting(void)
 {
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] srcu: Provide polling interfaces for Tree SRCU grace periods

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

There is a need for a polling interface for SRCU grace
periods, so this commit supplies get_state_synchronize_srcu(),
start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and poll_state_synchronize_srcu() for this
purpose.  The first can be used if future grace periods are inevitable
(perhaps due to a later call_srcu() invocation), the second if future
grace periods might not otherwise happen, and the third to check if a
grace period has elapsed since the corresponding call to either of the
first two.

As with get_state_synchronize_rcu() and cond_synchronize_rcu(),
the return value from either get_state_synchronize_srcu() or
start_poll_synchronize_srcu() must be passed in to a later call to
poll_state_synchronize_srcu().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
[ paulmck: Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() per kernel test robot feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply feedback from Neeraj Upadhyay. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201117004017.GA7444@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72/
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 9a7b650..c5d0c03 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -810,7 +810,8 @@ static void srcu_leak_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 /*
  * Start an SRCU grace period, and also queue the callback if non-NULL.
  */
-static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, bool do_norm)
+static unsigned long srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp,
+					     struct rcu_head *rhp, bool do_norm)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int idx;
@@ -819,10 +820,12 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rh
 	unsigned long s;
 	struct srcu_data *sdp;
 
+	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(ssp);
 	sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda);
 	spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
-	rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp);
+	if (rhp)
+		rcu_segcblist_enqueue(&sdp->srcu_cblist, rhp);
 	rcu_segcblist_advance(&sdp->srcu_cblist,
 			      rcu_seq_current(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq));
 	s = rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
@@ -841,6 +844,7 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rh
 	else if (needexp)
 		srcu_funnel_exp_start(ssp, sdp->mynode, s);
 	srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
+	return s;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -874,7 +878,6 @@ static void srcu_gp_start_if_needed(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rh
 static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 			rcu_callback_t func, bool do_norm)
 {
-	check_init_srcu_struct(ssp);
 	if (debug_rcu_head_queue(rhp)) {
 		/* Probable double call_srcu(), so leak the callback. */
 		WRITE_ONCE(rhp->func, srcu_leak_callback);
@@ -882,7 +885,7 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp,
 		return;
 	}
 	rhp->func = func;
-	srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
+	(void)srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, rhp, do_norm);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1011,6 +1014,62 @@ void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
 
+/**
+ * get_state_synchronize_srcu - Provide an end-of-grace-period cookie
+ * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for.
+ *
+ * This function returns a cookie that can be passed to
+ * poll_state_synchronize_srcu(), which will return true if a full grace
+ * period has elapsed in the meantime.  It is the caller's responsibility
+ * to make sure that grace period happens, for example, by invoking
+ * call_srcu() after return from get_state_synchronize_srcu().
+ */
+unsigned long get_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+	// Any prior manipulation of SRCU-protected data must happen
+	// before the load from ->srcu_gp_seq.
+	smp_mb();
+	return rcu_seq_snap(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_state_synchronize_srcu);
+
+/**
+ * start_poll_synchronize_srcu - Provide cookie and start grace period
+ * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for.
+ *
+ * This function returns a cookie that can be passed to
+ * poll_state_synchronize_srcu(), which will return true if a full grace
+ * period has elapsed in the meantime.  Unlike get_state_synchronize_srcu(),
+ * this function also ensures that any needed SRCU grace period will be
+ * started.  This convenience does come at a cost in terms of CPU overhead.
+ */
+unsigned long start_poll_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
+{
+	return srcu_gp_start_if_needed(ssp, NULL, true);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_srcu);
+
+/**
+ * poll_state_synchronize_srcu - Has cookie's grace period ended?
+ * @ssp: srcu_struct to provide cookie for.
+ * @cookie: Return value from get_state_synchronize_srcu() or start_poll_synchronize_srcu().
+ *
+ * This function takes the cookie that was returned from either
+ * get_state_synchronize_srcu() or start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and
+ * returns @true if an SRCU grace period elapsed since the time that the
+ * cookie was created.
+ */
+bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie)
+{
+	if (!rcu_seq_done(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq, cookie))
+		return false;
+	// Ensure that the end of the SRCU grace period happens before
+	// any subsequent code that the caller might execute.
+	smp_mb(); // ^^^
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(poll_state_synchronize_srcu);
+
 /*
  * Callback function for srcu_barrier() use.
  */
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] srcu: Document polling interfaces for Tree SRCU grace periods

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit adds requirements documentation for the
get_state_synchronize_srcu(), start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and
poll_state_synchronize_srcu() functions.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
index e8c84fc..93a189a 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst
@@ -2600,6 +2600,24 @@ also includes ``DEFINE_SRCU()``, ``DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU()``, and
 ``init_srcu_struct()`` APIs for defining and initializing
 ``srcu_struct`` structures.
 
+More recently, the SRCU API has added polling interfaces:
+
+#. start_poll_synchronize_srcu() returns a cookie identifying
+   the completion of a future SRCU grace period and ensures
+   that this grace period will be started.
+#. poll_state_synchronize_srcu() returns ``true`` iff the
+   specified cookie corresponds to an already-completed
+   SRCU grace period.
+#. get_state_synchronize_srcu() returns a cookie just like
+   start_poll_synchronize_srcu() does, but differs in that
+   it does nothing to ensure that any future SRCU grace period
+   will be started.
+
+These functions are used to avoid unnecessary SRCU grace periods in
+certain types of buffer-cache algorithms having multi-stage age-out
+mechanisms.  The idea is that by the time the block has aged completely
+from the cache, an SRCU grace period will be very likely to have elapsed.
+
 Tasks RCU
 ~~~~~~~~~
 
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] srcu: Add comment explaining cookie overflow/wrap

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit adds to the poll_state_synchronize_srcu() header comment
describing the issues surrounding SRCU cookie overflow/wrap for the
different kernel configurations.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index c5d0c03..119938d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -1058,6 +1058,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(start_poll_synchronize_srcu);
  * get_state_synchronize_srcu() or start_poll_synchronize_srcu(), and
  * returns @true if an SRCU grace period elapsed since the time that the
  * cookie was created.
+ *
+ * Because cookies are finite in size, wrapping/overflow is possible.
+ * This is more pronounced on 32-bit systems where cookies are 32 bits,
+ * where in theory wrapping could happen in about 14 hours assuming
+ * 25-microsecond expedited SRCU grace periods.  However, a more likely
+ * overflow lower bound is on the order of 24 days in the case of
+ * one-millisecond SRCU grace periods.  Of course, wrapping in a 64-bit
+ * system requires geologic timespans, as in more than seven million years
+ * even for expedited SRCU grace periods.
+ *
+ * Wrapping/overflow is much more of an issue for CONFIG_SMP=n systems
+ * that also have CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n, which selects Tiny SRCU.  This uses
+ * a 16-bit cookie, which rcutorture routinely wraps in a matter of a
+ * few minutes.  If this proves to be a problem, this counter will be
+ * expanded to the same size as for Tree SRCU.
  */
 bool poll_state_synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, unsigned long cookie)
 {
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcutorture: Prepare for ->start_gp_poll and ->poll_gp_state

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

The new get_state_synchronize_srcu(), start_poll_synchronize_srcu() and
poll_state_synchronize_srcu() functions need to be tested, and so this
commit prepares by renaming the rcu_torture_ops field ->get_state to
->get_gp_state in order to be consistent with the upcoming ->start_gp_poll
and ->poll_gp_state fields.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 528ed10..bcea23c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ struct rcu_torture_ops {
 	void (*deferred_free)(struct rcu_torture *p);
 	void (*sync)(void);
 	void (*exp_sync)(void);
-	unsigned long (*get_state)(void);
+	unsigned long (*get_gp_state)(void);
 	void (*cond_sync)(unsigned long oldstate);
 	call_rcu_func_t call;
 	void (*cb_barrier)(void);
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_ops = {
 	.deferred_free	= rcu_torture_deferred_free,
 	.sync		= synchronize_rcu,
 	.exp_sync	= synchronize_rcu_expedited,
-	.get_state	= get_state_synchronize_rcu,
+	.get_gp_state	= get_state_synchronize_rcu,
 	.cond_sync	= cond_synchronize_rcu,
 	.call		= call_rcu,
 	.cb_barrier	= rcu_barrier,
@@ -1050,10 +1050,10 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 	/* Initialize synctype[] array.  If none set, take default. */
 	if (!gp_cond1 && !gp_exp1 && !gp_normal1 && !gp_sync1)
 		gp_cond1 = gp_exp1 = gp_normal1 = gp_sync1 = true;
-	if (gp_cond1 && cur_ops->get_state && cur_ops->cond_sync) {
+	if (gp_cond1 && cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->cond_sync) {
 		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_COND_GET;
 		pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs.\n", __func__);
-	} else if (gp_cond && (!cur_ops->get_state || !cur_ops->cond_sync)) {
+	} else if (gp_cond && (!cur_ops->get_gp_state || !cur_ops->cond_sync)) {
 		pr_alert("%s: gp_cond without primitives.\n", __func__);
 	}
 	if (gp_exp1 && cur_ops->exp_sync) {
@@ -1119,7 +1119,7 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 				break;
 			case RTWS_COND_GET:
 				rcu_torture_writer_state = RTWS_COND_GET;
-				gp_snap = cur_ops->get_state();
+				gp_snap = cur_ops->get_gp_state();
 				i = torture_random(&rand) % 16;
 				if (i != 0)
 					schedule_timeout_interruptible(i);
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcutorture: Add writer-side tests of polling grace-period API

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit adds writer-side testing of the polling grace-period API.
One test verifies that the polling API sees a grace period caused by
some other mechanism.  Another test verifies that using the polling API
to wait for a grace period does not result in too-short grace periods.
A third test verifies that the polling API does not report
completion within a read-side critical section.  A fourth and final
test verifies that the polling API does report completion given an
intervening grace period.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index bcea23c..78ba95d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ torture_param(bool, gp_cond, false, "Use conditional/async GP wait primitives");
 torture_param(bool, gp_exp, false, "Use expedited GP wait primitives");
 torture_param(bool, gp_normal, false,
 	     "Use normal (non-expedited) GP wait primitives");
+torture_param(bool, gp_poll, false, "Use polling GP wait primitives");
 torture_param(bool, gp_sync, false, "Use synchronous GP wait primitives");
 torture_param(int, irqreader, 1, "Allow RCU readers from irq handlers");
 torture_param(int, leakpointer, 0, "Leak pointer dereferences from readers");
@@ -183,9 +184,11 @@ static int rcu_torture_writer_state;
 #define RTWS_EXP_SYNC		4
 #define RTWS_COND_GET		5
 #define RTWS_COND_SYNC		6
-#define RTWS_SYNC		7
-#define RTWS_STUTTER		8
-#define RTWS_STOPPING		9
+#define RTWS_POLL_GET		7
+#define RTWS_POLL_WAIT		8
+#define RTWS_SYNC		9
+#define RTWS_STUTTER		10
+#define RTWS_STOPPING		11
 static const char * const rcu_torture_writer_state_names[] = {
 	"RTWS_FIXED_DELAY",
 	"RTWS_DELAY",
@@ -194,6 +197,8 @@ static const char * const rcu_torture_writer_state_names[] = {
 	"RTWS_EXP_SYNC",
 	"RTWS_COND_GET",
 	"RTWS_COND_SYNC",
+	"RTWS_POLL_GET",
+	"RTWS_POLL_WAIT",
 	"RTWS_SYNC",
 	"RTWS_STUTTER",
 	"RTWS_STOPPING",
@@ -312,6 +317,8 @@ struct rcu_torture_ops {
 	void (*sync)(void);
 	void (*exp_sync)(void);
 	unsigned long (*get_gp_state)(void);
+	unsigned long (*start_gp_poll)(void);
+	bool (*poll_gp_state)(unsigned long oldstate);
 	void (*cond_sync)(unsigned long oldstate);
 	call_rcu_func_t call;
 	void (*cb_barrier)(void);
@@ -570,6 +577,21 @@ static void srcu_torture_synchronize(void)
 	synchronize_srcu(srcu_ctlp);
 }
 
+static unsigned long srcu_torture_get_gp_state(void)
+{
+	return get_state_synchronize_srcu(srcu_ctlp);
+}
+
+static unsigned long srcu_torture_start_gp_poll(void)
+{
+	return start_poll_synchronize_srcu(srcu_ctlp);
+}
+
+static bool srcu_torture_poll_gp_state(unsigned long oldstate)
+{
+	return poll_state_synchronize_srcu(srcu_ctlp, oldstate);
+}
+
 static void srcu_torture_call(struct rcu_head *head,
 			      rcu_callback_t func)
 {
@@ -601,6 +623,9 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops srcu_ops = {
 	.deferred_free	= srcu_torture_deferred_free,
 	.sync		= srcu_torture_synchronize,
 	.exp_sync	= srcu_torture_synchronize_expedited,
+	.get_gp_state	= srcu_torture_get_gp_state,
+	.start_gp_poll	= srcu_torture_start_gp_poll,
+	.poll_gp_state	= srcu_torture_poll_gp_state,
 	.call		= srcu_torture_call,
 	.cb_barrier	= srcu_torture_barrier,
 	.stats		= srcu_torture_stats,
@@ -1027,18 +1052,20 @@ static int
 rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 {
 	bool can_expedite = !rcu_gp_is_expedited() && !rcu_gp_is_normal();
+	unsigned long cookie;
 	int expediting = 0;
 	unsigned long gp_snap;
 	bool gp_cond1 = gp_cond, gp_exp1 = gp_exp, gp_normal1 = gp_normal;
-	bool gp_sync1 = gp_sync;
+	bool gp_poll1 = gp_poll, gp_sync1 = gp_sync;
 	int i;
+	int idx;
 	int oldnice = task_nice(current);
 	struct rcu_torture *rp;
 	struct rcu_torture *old_rp;
 	static DEFINE_TORTURE_RANDOM(rand);
 	bool stutter_waited;
 	int synctype[] = { RTWS_DEF_FREE, RTWS_EXP_SYNC,
-			   RTWS_COND_GET, RTWS_SYNC };
+			   RTWS_COND_GET, RTWS_POLL_GET, RTWS_SYNC };
 	int nsynctypes = 0;
 
 	VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("rcu_torture_writer task started");
@@ -1048,8 +1075,8 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 			 torture_type, cur_ops->name);
 
 	/* Initialize synctype[] array.  If none set, take default. */
-	if (!gp_cond1 && !gp_exp1 && !gp_normal1 && !gp_sync1)
-		gp_cond1 = gp_exp1 = gp_normal1 = gp_sync1 = true;
+	if (!gp_cond1 && !gp_exp1 && !gp_normal1 && !gp_poll1 && !gp_sync1)
+		gp_cond1 = gp_exp1 = gp_normal1 = gp_poll1 = gp_sync1 = true;
 	if (gp_cond1 && cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->cond_sync) {
 		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_COND_GET;
 		pr_info("%s: Testing conditional GPs.\n", __func__);
@@ -1068,6 +1095,12 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 	} else if (gp_normal && !cur_ops->deferred_free) {
 		pr_alert("%s: gp_normal without primitives.\n", __func__);
 	}
+	if (gp_poll1 && cur_ops->start_gp_poll && cur_ops->poll_gp_state) {
+		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_POLL_GET;
+		pr_info("%s: Testing polling GPs.\n", __func__);
+	} else if (gp_poll && (!cur_ops->start_gp_poll || !cur_ops->poll_gp_state)) {
+		pr_alert("%s: gp_poll without primitives.\n", __func__);
+	}
 	if (gp_sync1 && cur_ops->sync) {
 		synctype[nsynctypes++] = RTWS_SYNC;
 		pr_info("%s: Testing normal GPs.\n", __func__);
@@ -1107,6 +1140,18 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 			atomic_inc(&rcu_torture_wcount[i]);
 			WRITE_ONCE(old_rp->rtort_pipe_count,
 				   old_rp->rtort_pipe_count + 1);
+			if (cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->poll_gp_state) {
+				idx = cur_ops->readlock();
+				cookie = cur_ops->get_gp_state();
+				WARN_ONCE(rcu_torture_writer_state != RTWS_DEF_FREE &&
+					  cur_ops->poll_gp_state(cookie),
+					  "%s: Cookie check 1 failed %s(%d) %lu->%lu\n",
+					  __func__,
+					  rcu_torture_writer_state_getname(),
+					  rcu_torture_writer_state,
+					  cookie, cur_ops->get_gp_state());
+				cur_ops->readunlock(idx);
+			}
 			switch (synctype[torture_random(&rand) % nsynctypes]) {
 			case RTWS_DEF_FREE:
 				rcu_torture_writer_state = RTWS_DEF_FREE;
@@ -1128,6 +1173,18 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 				cur_ops->cond_sync(gp_snap);
 				rcu_torture_pipe_update(old_rp);
 				break;
+			case RTWS_POLL_GET:
+				rcu_torture_writer_state = RTWS_POLL_GET;
+				gp_snap = cur_ops->start_gp_poll();
+				rcu_torture_writer_state = RTWS_POLL_WAIT;
+				while (!cur_ops->poll_gp_state(gp_snap)) {
+					i = torture_random(&rand) % 16;
+					if (i != 0)
+						schedule_timeout_interruptible(i);
+					udelay(torture_random(&rand) % 1000);
+				}
+				rcu_torture_pipe_update(old_rp);
+				break;
 			case RTWS_SYNC:
 				rcu_torture_writer_state = RTWS_SYNC;
 				cur_ops->sync();
@@ -1137,6 +1194,14 @@ rcu_torture_writer(void *arg)
 				WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 				break;
 			}
+			if (cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->poll_gp_state)
+				WARN_ONCE(rcu_torture_writer_state != RTWS_DEF_FREE &&
+					  !cur_ops->poll_gp_state(cookie),
+					  "%s: Cookie check 2 failed %s(%d) %lu->%lu\n",
+					  __func__,
+					  rcu_torture_writer_state_getname(),
+					  rcu_torture_writer_state,
+					  cookie, cur_ops->get_gp_state());
 		}
 		WRITE_ONCE(rcu_torture_current_version,
 			   rcu_torture_current_version + 1);
-- 
2.9.5

[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcutorture: Add reader-side tests of polling grace-period API

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit adds reader-side testing of the polling grace-period API.
This testing verifies that a cookie obtained in an SRCU read-side critical
section does not get a true return from poll_state_synchronize_srcu()
within that same critical section.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20201112201547.GF3365678@moria.home.lan/
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 78ba95d..96d55f0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1429,6 +1429,7 @@ rcutorture_loop_extend(int *readstate, struct torture_random_state *trsp,
  */
 static bool rcu_torture_one_read(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 {
+	unsigned long cookie;
 	int i;
 	unsigned long started;
 	unsigned long completed;
@@ -1444,6 +1445,8 @@ static bool rcu_torture_one_read(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_is_watching());
 	newstate = rcutorture_extend_mask(readstate, trsp);
 	rcutorture_one_extend(&readstate, newstate, trsp, rtrsp++);
+	if (cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->poll_gp_state)
+		cookie = cur_ops->get_gp_state();
 	started = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
 	ts = rcu_trace_clock_local();
 	p = rcu_dereference_check(rcu_torture_current,
@@ -1480,6 +1483,13 @@ static bool rcu_torture_one_read(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 	}
 	__this_cpu_inc(rcu_torture_batch[completed]);
 	preempt_enable();
+	if (cur_ops->get_gp_state && cur_ops->poll_gp_state)
+		WARN_ONCE(cur_ops->poll_gp_state(cookie),
+			  "%s: Cookie check 3 failed %s(%d) %lu->%lu\n",
+			  __func__,
+			  rcu_torture_writer_state_getname(),
+			  rcu_torture_writer_state,
+			  cookie, cur_ops->get_gp_state());
 	rcutorture_one_extend(&readstate, 0, trsp, rtrsp);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_MASK);
 	// This next splat is expected behavior if leakpointer, especially
-- 
2.9.5