From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kvfree_rcu: Allocate a page for a single argument
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 20:57:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120195757.3lgjrpvmzjvb2nce@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210120162148.1973-1-urezki@gmail.com>
On 2021-01-20 17:21:46 [+0100], Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> For a single argument we can directly request a page from a caller
> context when a "carry page block" is run out of free spots. Instead
> of hitting a slow path we can request an extra page by demand and
> proceed with a fast path.
>
> A single-argument kvfree_rcu() must be invoked in sleepable contexts,
> and that its fallback is the relatively high latency synchronize_rcu().
> Single-argument kvfree_rcu() therefore uses GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> to allow limited sleeping within the memory allocator.
>
> [ paulmck: Add add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock header comment per Michal Hocko. ]
> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index e04e336bee42..2014fb22644d 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -3465,37 +3465,50 @@ run_page_cache_worker(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
> }
> }
>
> +// Record ptr in a page managed by krcp, with the pre-krc_this_cpu_lock()
> +// state specified by flags. If can_alloc is true, the caller must
> +// be schedulable and not be holding any locks or mutexes that might be
> +// acquired by the memory allocator or anything that it might invoke.
> +// Returns true if ptr was successfully recorded, else the caller must
> +// use a fallback.
The whole RCU department is getting swamped by the // comments. Can't we
have proper kernel doc and /* */ style comments like the remaining part
of the kernel?
> static inline bool
> -kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> +add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu **krcp,
> + unsigned long *flags, void *ptr, bool can_alloc)
> {
> struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *bnode;
> int idx;
>
> - if (unlikely(!krcp->initialized))
> + *krcp = krc_this_cpu_lock(flags);
> + if (unlikely(!(*krcp)->initialized))
> return false;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&krcp->lock);
> idx = !!is_vmalloc_addr(ptr);
>
> /* Check if a new block is required. */
> - if (!krcp->bkvhead[idx] ||
> - krcp->bkvhead[idx]->nr_records == KVFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR) {
> - bnode = get_cached_bnode(krcp);
> - /* Switch to emergency path. */
> + if (!(*krcp)->bkvhead[idx] ||
> + (*krcp)->bkvhead[idx]->nr_records == KVFREE_BULK_MAX_ENTR) {
> + bnode = get_cached_bnode(*krcp);
> + if (!bnode && can_alloc) {
> + krc_this_cpu_unlock(*krcp, *flags);
> + bnode = (struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
There is no need for this cast.
> + __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + *krcp = krc_this_cpu_lock(flags);
so if bnode is NULL you could retry get_cached_bnode() since it might
have been filled (given preemption or CPU migration changed something).
Judging from patch #3 you think that a CPU migration is a bad thing. But
why?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-20 16:21 [PATCH 1/3] kvfree_rcu: Allocate a page for a single argument Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2021-01-20 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] kvfree_rcu: Use __GFP_NOMEMALLOC for single-argument kvfree_rcu() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2021-01-28 18:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-20 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvfree_rcu: use migrate_disable/enable() Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2021-01-20 19:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-20 21:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-23 9:31 ` 回复: " Zhang, Qiang
2021-01-24 21:57 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-25 1:50 ` 回复: " Zhang, Qiang
2021-01-25 2:18 ` Zhang, Qiang
2021-01-25 13:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-26 9:33 ` 回复: " Zhang, Qiang
2021-01-26 13:43 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-20 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] kvfree_rcu: Allocate a page for a single argument Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-20 19:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2021-01-20 21:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-21 13:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-21 15:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-21 19:17 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-22 11:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-22 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-21 12:38 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-22 11:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-01-22 14:21 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-25 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-25 14:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-25 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-25 16:25 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-28 15:11 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-28 15:17 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-28 15:30 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-01-28 18:02 ` Uladzislau Rezki
[not found] ` <YBPNvbJLg56XU8co@dhcp22.suse.cz>
2021-01-29 16:35 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-01 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-01 14:44 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2021-02-03 19:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210120195757.3lgjrpvmzjvb2nce@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).