rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] srcu: Fix broken node geometry after early ssp init
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:07:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511230745.2894650-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511230720.GA2894512@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry()
will have its srcu_node hierarchy based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS.  Once
rcu_init_geometry() is called, this hierarchy is compressed as needed
for the actual maximum number of CPUs for this system.

Later on, that srcu_struct structure is confused, sometimes referring
to its initial CONFIG_NR_CPUS-based hierarchy, and sometimes instead
to the new num_possible_cpus() hierarchy.  For example, each of its
->mynode fields continues to reference the original leaf rcu_node
structures, some of which might no longer exist.  On the other hand,
srcu_for_each_node_breadth_first() traverses to the new node hierarchy.

There are at least two bad possible outcomes to this:

1) a) A callback enqueued early on an srcu_data structure (call it
      *sdp) is recorded pending on sdp->mynode->srcu_data_have_cbs in
      srcu_funnel_gp_start() with sdp->mynode pointing to a deep leaf
      (say 3 levels).

   b) The grace period ends after rcu_init_geometry() shrinks the
      nodes level to a single one.  srcu_gp_end() walks through the new
      srcu_node hierarchy without ever reaching the old leaves so the
      callback is never executed.

   This is easily reproduced on an 8 CPUs machine with CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= 32
   and "rcupdate.rcu_self_test=1". The srcu_barrier() after early tests
   verification never completes and the boot hangs:

	[ 5413.141029] INFO: task swapper/0:1 blocked for more than 4915 seconds.
	[ 5413.147564]       Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4+ #28
	[ 5413.151927] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
	[ 5413.159753] task:swapper/0       state:D stack:    0 pid:    1 ppid:     0 flags:0x00004000
	[ 5413.168099] Call Trace:
	[ 5413.170555]  __schedule+0x36c/0x930
	[ 5413.174057]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.178423]  schedule+0x46/0xf0
	[ 5413.181575]  schedule_timeout+0x284/0x380
	[ 5413.185591]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.189957]  ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
	[ 5413.193882]  ? mark_held_locks+0x61/0x80
	[ 5413.197809]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
	[ 5413.202173]  ? wait_for_completion+0x88/0x110
	[ 5413.206535]  wait_for_completion+0xb4/0x110
	[ 5413.210724]  ? srcu_torture_stats_print+0x110/0x110
	[ 5413.215610]  srcu_barrier+0x187/0x200
	[ 5413.219277]  ? rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0x50/0x50
	[ 5413.224244]  ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
	[ 5413.227907]  rcu_verify_early_boot_tests+0x2d/0x40
	[ 5413.232700]  do_one_initcall+0x63/0x310
	[ 5413.236541]  ? rdinit_setup+0x2b/0x2b
	[ 5413.240207]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80
	[ 5413.244912]  kernel_init_freeable+0x253/0x28f
	[ 5413.249273]  ? rest_init+0x250/0x250
	[ 5413.252846]  kernel_init+0xa/0x110
	[ 5413.256257]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

2) An srcu_struct structure that is initialized before rcu_init_geometry()
   and used afterward will always have stale rdp->mynode references,
   resulting in callbacks to be missed in srcu_gp_end(), just like in
   the previous scenario.

This commit therefore causes init_srcu_struct_nodes to initialize the
geometry, if needed.  This ensures that the srcu_node hierarchy is
properly built and distributed from the get-go.

Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcu.h      |  2 ++
 kernel/rcu/srcutree.c |  3 +++
 kernel/rcu/tree.c     | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index ca3f2af32bf8..28de768bd875 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -308,6 +308,8 @@ static inline void rcu_init_levelspread(int *levelspread, const int *levelcnt)
 	}
 }
 
+extern void rcu_init_geometry(void);
+
 /* Returns a pointer to the first leaf rcu_node structure. */
 #define rcu_first_leaf_node() (rcu_state.level[rcu_num_lvls - 1])
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 9ec35c158740..5fdbde687feb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
 	struct srcu_node *snp;
 	struct srcu_node *snp_first;
 
+	/* Initialize geometry if it has not already been initialized. */
+	rcu_init_geometry();
+
 	/* Work out the overall tree geometry. */
 	ssp->level[0] = &ssp->node[0];
 	for (i = 1; i < rcu_num_lvls; i++)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c35b15229cff..0420b23fc9d0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -4582,11 +4582,25 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(void)
  * replace the definitions in tree.h because those are needed to size
  * the ->node array in the rcu_state structure.
  */
-static void __init rcu_init_geometry(void)
+void rcu_init_geometry(void)
 {
 	ulong d;
 	int i;
+	static unsigned long old_nr_cpu_ids;
 	int rcu_capacity[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
+	static bool initialized;
+
+	if (initialized) {
+		/*
+		 * Warn if setup_nr_cpu_ids() had not yet been invoked,
+		 * unless nr_cpus_ids == NR_CPUS, in which case who cares?
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(old_nr_cpu_ids != nr_cpu_ids);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	old_nr_cpu_ids = nr_cpu_ids;
+	initialized = true;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialize any unspecified boot parameters.
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 23:07 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] SRCU updates for v5.14 Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] srcu: Remove superfluous sdp->srcu_lock_count zero filling Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] srcu: Remove superfluous ssp initialization for early callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] srcu: Unconditionally embed struct lockdep_map Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] srcu: Initialize SRCU after timers Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-05-11 23:07 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] srcu: Early test SRCU polling start Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu-tasks: Add block comment laying out RCU Tasks design Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rcu-tasks: Add block comment laying out RCU Rude design Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] rcu-tasks: Make ksoftirqd provide RCU Tasks quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2021-05-11 23:09 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] tasks-rcu: Make show_rcu_tasks_gp_kthreads() be static inline Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511230745.2894650-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).