From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56BFC432BE for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 18:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C9661042 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 18:45:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231745AbhHSSqD (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:46:03 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:48924 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233792AbhHSSqC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 14:46:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 20:45:23 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1629398724; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4UXnzMfZvo21+qH0D9x+E2yduVvhbA6kY0FK1l9dpa0=; b=r0VgNT/V6SnEJV2fkublSFgBCUaXTtNdQEKhTBBeaFDdLTD0kqhZyKtjDFaGWLqD9NvQvP yA+lKsFNPNmoJwqRW/t3dGKBbNns3K0YgtdjrM5vOXIantOk/shuWg3J3hfZ3gqTiIw6F4 TbfEs8eZ677p+Ik3QionHwuLzgVWu1dykPQ3ZTDkX55FtttNUVTtP/hr8S7mY/uXjvCKcs HlGEU6hcNWr/X/+lpli9Bu5wudplM4GYCWqVv7MyhqMcnrfALlUUWVyOrQmr6ipYkk/8EY eEEKrI5u/n27v+pPKSYQD+PRU0oj3zteckkqNBq2HyT5bzlDpgoLEYQHFO/+pQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1629398724; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4UXnzMfZvo21+qH0D9x+E2yduVvhbA6kY0FK1l9dpa0=; b=3cbQlYvV2BF95EtcaMtqiJGkGyniOF0Pp3h5tATTe5DCvmGv8CL6h6oB85mgR22wMGo5JN gLKOpd2mU52oD7Dw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Valentin Schneider , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Frederic Weisbecker , Josh Triplett , Mathieu Desnoyers , Davidlohr Bueso , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , Anshuman Khandual , Vincenzo Frascino , Steven Price , Ard Biesheuvel , Boqun Feng , Mike Galbraith , Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcutorture: Avoid problematic critical section nesting on RT Message-ID: <20210819184523.laa5vwvfsgotbgx5@linutronix.de> References: <20210811201354.1976839-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210811201354.1976839-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210817121345.5iyj5epemczn3a52@linutronix.de> <20210817131741.evduh4fw7vyv2dzt@linutronix.de> <20210817144018.nqssoq475vitrqlv@linutronix.de> <20210818224651.GY4126399@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> <20210819153927.clqxr4f7qegpflbr@linutronix.de> <20210819154708.3efz6jtgwtuhpeds@linutronix.de> <20210819182035.GF4126399@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20210819182035.GF4126399@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org On 2021-08-19 11:20:35 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > This piece above, I don't understand. I had it running for a while and > > it didn't explode. Let me try TREE01 for 30min without that piece. >=20 > This might be historical. There was a time when interrupts being > disabled across rcu_read_unlock() meant that preemption had to have > been disabled across the entire RCU read-side critical section. >=20 > I am not seeing a purpose for it now, but I could easily be missing > something, especially given my tenuous grasp of RT. Okay. So the 30min test didn't trigger any warnings=E2=80=A6 > Either way, looking forward to the next version! Good. So if you liked what you have seen then I'm going to resubmit the above as a proper patch then. Thanks! > Thanx, Paul Sebastian