rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: w@1wt.eu
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Making races happen more often
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 20:51:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210926035103.GA1953486@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1> (raw)

Hello, Willy!

Continuing from linkedin:

> Maybe this doesn't work as well as expected because of the common L3 cache
> that runs at a single frequency and that imposes discrete timings. Also,
> I noticed that on modern CPUs, cache lines tend to "stick" at least a few
> cycles once they're in a cache, which helps the corresponding CPU chain
> a few atomic ops undisturbed. For example on a 8-core Ryzen I'm seeing a
> minimum of 8ns between two threads of the same core (L1 probably split in
> two halves), 25ns between two L2 and 60ns between the two halves (CCX)
> of the L3. This certainly makes it much harder to trigger concurrency
> issues. Well let's continue by e-mail, it's a real pain to type in this
> awful interface.

Indeed, I get best (worst?) results from memory latency on multi-socket
systems.  And these results were not subtle:

	https://paulmck.livejournal.com/62071.html

All that aside, any advice on portably and usefully getting 2-3x clock
frequency differences into testing would be quite welcome.

							Thanx, Paul

             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-26  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-26  3:51 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2021-09-26  4:41 ` Making races happen more often Willy Tarreau
2021-09-27  3:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-27  6:49     ` Willy Tarreau
2021-09-28  4:01       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-29 19:59         ` Willy Tarreau
2021-09-30 18:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-30 21:12             ` Willy Tarreau
2021-10-07  0:44               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-10-07 17:53                 ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210926035103.GA1953486@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).