rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
To: "houtao (A)" <houtao1@huawei.com>, "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ming.lei@redhat.com" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>, zhengchuan <zhengchuan@huawei.com>,
	"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	"paulmck@kernel.org" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"joel@joelfernandes.org" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"rcu@vger.kernel.org" <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:43:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cc465cc-d68c-088e-0729-2695279c7853@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9ce86d6-dadb-9301-7d76-8cef81d782fd@huawei.com>



On 2019/12/31 22:55, houtao (A) wrote:

> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 6e8543ca6912..179e0056fae1 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,14 @@ struct hd_struct *disk_map_sector_rcu(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
>   		part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[i]);
> 
>   		if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector)) {
> -			rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
> +			struct hd_struct *old;
> +
> +			if (!hd_struct_try_get(part))
> +				break;
> +
> +			old = xchg(&ptbl->last_lookup, part);
> +			if (old)
> +				hd_struct_put(old);
>   			return part;
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -1231,7 +1238,11 @@ static void disk_replace_part_tbl(struct gendisk *disk,
>   	rcu_assign_pointer(disk->part_tbl, new_ptbl);
> 
>   	if (old_ptbl) {
> -		rcu_assign_pointer(old_ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +		struct hd_struct *part;
> +
> +		part = xchg(&old_ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +		if (part)
> +			hd_struct_put(part);
>   		kfree_rcu(old_ptbl, rcu_head);
>   	}
>   }
> diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
> index 98d60a59b843..441c1c591c04 100644
> --- a/block/partition-generic.c
> +++ b/block/partition-generic.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
>   		return;
> 
>   	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
> -	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +	if (cmpxchg(&ptbl->last_lookup, part, NULL) == part)
> +		hd_struct_put(part);
>   	kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
>   	device_del(part_to_dev(part));
> 
This change will add more calling of hd_struct_try_get()/hd_struct_put()
when set last_lookup. Thus, Tao warried abort extra overhead.

We test the patch on a SSD disk by fio with config:
[global]
rw=randread
bs=4k
numjobs=2
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=32
direct=1
runtime=120
size=100G
group_reporting
time_based

[sda1]
filename=/dev/sda1

[sda2]
filename=/dev/sda2

[sda3]
filename=/dev/sda3

[sda4]
filename=/dev/sda4

Compared with the previous version, io bandwidth have no any degeneration.

Thanks,
Yufen






      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-03 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191231110945.10857-1-yuyufen@huawei.com>
2019-12-31 14:55 ` [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted Hou Tao
2019-12-31 23:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-01  2:33     ` htbegin
2020-01-01  3:39       ` htbegin
2020-01-03 23:45     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-01-04  9:16       ` Hou Tao
2020-01-02  1:23   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03  3:06     ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03  4:18       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03  7:35         ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03  8:17           ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 12:03             ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-03 15:16               ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06  7:39                 ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-06  8:11                   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06  9:41                     ` Hou Tao
2020-01-06 10:05                       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 11:40                         ` Hou Tao
2020-01-08  3:19                           ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 12:43   ` Yufen Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5cc465cc-d68c-088e-0729-2695279c7853@huawei.com \
    --to=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).