From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, "Joel Fernandes \(Google\)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
frextrite@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
kernel-team@android.com, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
vpillai@digitalocean.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] RCU dyntick nesting counter cleanups for rcu -dev
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 12:26:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wo5adfh8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200516171223.GC2639@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Paul,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> writes:
> And I have allegedly resolved the conflicts with Thomas's and Peter's
> series, or at least the noinstr-rcu-nmi-2020-05-15 branch of that series.
> At least one conflict was completely invisible to "git rebase" (but
> fortunately blindingly obvious to the compiler). This naturally makes
> me suspect that additional adjustments might be needed. Especially
> given that misplaced instrumentation_begin() and instrumentation_end()
> calls are invisible not only to the compiler, but also to rcutorture in
> my setup. (For example, tracing before instrumentation_begin() or after
> instrumentation_end() is a bug.)
there is tooling to verify that. If you merge
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git entry-v7-full
into your dev branch (trivial conflict) and after building it, run:
objtool check -fal $BUILDIR/vmlinux.o
Note: This only covers built-in code. So if you have code you want to
check make sure it's not built as module.
Just did that and it complains about:
../build/vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_eqs_enter.constprop.0()+0xa9: call to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() leaves .noinstr.text section
But that's even the case on my branch without your changes.
The call to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() is definitely before
instrumentation_end() so this needs to be investigated on the objtool
side. Peter?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-17 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 12:05 [PATCH v3 0/5] RCU dyntick nesting counter cleanups for rcu -dev Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] Revert b8c17e6664c4 ("rcu: Maintain special bits at bottom of ->dynticks counter") Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] rcu/tree: Add better tracing for dyntick-idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] rcu/tree: Clean up dynticks counter usage Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 12:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] trace: events: rcu: Change description of rcu_dyntick trace event Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-05-04 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] RCU dyntick nesting counter cleanups for rcu -dev Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-04 17:37 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-05-04 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-04 18:18 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-05-16 17:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-17 10:26 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-05-17 16:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-17 19:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wo5adfh8.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=frextrite@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=madhuparnabhowmik04@gmail.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vpillai@digitalocean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).