From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65D6C433E1 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79DF2242B for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="DkLvRchV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730572AbgFUUA6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:00:58 -0400 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]:21106 "EHLO mail29.static.mailgun.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730591AbgFUUAz (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:00:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1592769654; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=PcRwyM/q7gRijAGFkGubRrPiplDl/KY95AYs4N79p00=; b=DkLvRchVQWE+Naj/fYZ8ket1S3DcKzo46fi1r2v0we8sUWDCCazsuuEdx86mhY9h6G/TJAhT UewmHouRPKzXfSDFwByBhLBM0+7FXaSWXFbEZzvb3aQ/am/feiKPAjo+PgxxnOmmja/J8Cw4 EvidoyNbwSfvGqlB9F2zdynImm0= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJkZDlkNSIsICJyY3VAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5eefbc668fe116ddd99cc020 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:00:38 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 61954C433B6; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [124.123.165.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: neeraju) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1058CC43395; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 20:00:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 1058CC43395 Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: aws-us-west-2-caf-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=neeraju@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overload To: paulmck@kernel.org Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1592764647-2452-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org> <20200621195052.GF9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> From: Neeraj Upadhyay Message-ID: <94686c2e-b589-2598-e658-42f13cec1216@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 01:30:31 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200621195052.GF9247@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org Hi Paul, On 6/22/2020 1:20 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 12:07:27AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: >> On callback overload, we want to force quiescent state immediately, >> for the first and second fqs. Enforce the same, by including >> RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD flag, in fqsstart check. >> >> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay > > Good catch! > > But what did you do to verify that this change does the right thing? > > Thanx, Paul > I haven't done a runtime verification of this code path; I posted this, based on review of this code. Thanks Neeraj >> --- >> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> index d0988a1..6226bfb 100644 >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c >> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_fqs_loop(void) >> break; >> /* If time for quiescent-state forcing, do it. */ >> if (!time_after(rcu_state.jiffies_force_qs, jiffies) || >> - (gf & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)) { >> + (gf & (RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS | RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD))) { >> trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, rcu_state.gp_seq, >> TPS("fqsstart")); >> rcu_gp_fqs(first_gp_fqs); >> -- >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, >> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >> -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation