rcu.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 18:12:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YT8AE3A25ZJhFd3N5dJhFUb0nRDUvwupPq=7QQFw7_KQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190811221111.99401-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:11 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu now has support to check for RCU reader sections
> as well as lock. Just use the support in it, instead of explicitly
> checking in the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>

Tejun,
Could you please Ack this patch? I have resent it here.

Thank you,
- Joel


> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c | 10 ++--------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 601d61150b65..e882477ebf6e 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -364,11 +364,6 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
>                          !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),              \
>                          "RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
>
> -#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq)                                     \
> -       RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&                       \
> -                        !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex),                  \
> -                        "RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
> -
>  #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq)                       \
>         RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&                       \
>                          !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) &&                \
> @@ -425,9 +420,8 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
>   * ignored.
>   */
>  #define for_each_pwq(pwq, wq)                                          \
> -       list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node)          \
> -               if (({ assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq); false; })) { }       \
> -               else
> +       list_for_each_entry_rcu((pwq), &(wq)->pwqs, pwqs_node,          \
> +                                lock_is_held(&(wq->mutex).dep_map))
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK
>
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-11 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-11 22:11 [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-12 20:22   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-12 20:42     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 21:24       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-08-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-08-12  5:02   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-08-12 13:03     ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 18:11       ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-12 20:01         ` Joel Fernandes
2019-08-12 20:05           ` Steven Rostedt
2019-08-11 22:12 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-08-14 19:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2) Tejun Heo
2019-08-14 22:42   ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEXW_YT8AE3A25ZJhFd3N5dJhFUb0nRDUvwupPq=7QQFw7_KQA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).