From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159ADC43215 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05472071A for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 14:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="A84KCxo3" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727586AbfKZO7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:59:02 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:46368 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726049AbfKZO7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:59:02 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a17so14328252lfi.13 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eayF6Yqhzpqvz9bB8ZXM3qGNWF9TDQ7NmIzBjxe7aYo=; b=A84KCxo3JplzfN47P0+T33FuhKaHV7oZBRfQOL7YKOccGbW9/xBjv9h36FbBYrSjwf xBzQA11iGqiNTu5DsHDgBfD0V9rH3G1l0ZVcZeaPdY4CP3EI43lByVv9yda3j2Oy7F4u u5EgyvHCgGd31lhCEpRV2T3l64+GUS4k7EjuXq9RMNWDxBYW4KAqHyz4iQT1nuKdIGhT J6cJmYSQaiw2PxyMbRS4Hg/ZVmu+BS6DNPFwlTrUbymkmRalxhRasFeL9PfcnxMR0SCK 4y9IyVL1JpZcGpOgSauIv6pPlRScB5yUuPYg+gc+iQ95uSF3uROri9GKH3Qr14jJzj4Z /gNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eayF6Yqhzpqvz9bB8ZXM3qGNWF9TDQ7NmIzBjxe7aYo=; b=qeRrgOPZumsGRQUVadPy13DmjIWr3rbjVk+FeUJLbodpoeTVO+oQ6dBPMG5hscRnLT DF+jMdhSMgTZcxoM7SFm5cHyC6o2erwpV0nvqkvtUjk5vFRMGvBpaxLPTDKg2VakYGnM 4bX9BA3Nv93de/ZHKyPuGOjlSGd/nFpaYyyjJOa+WsihGWjftnlNvQ8N7fKKlULuJqL+ Xh9x8Sj0tTMrXxa8QgLsgipw9On02AL5roqgFlhN3V7UWm32LQo11fmll9YYKUpUIpPV oRJ/+WkM7ZjG2DeDA+HZbi4qH63xkyROhMSNKwa9g53pDIYTfsFRxJFVSo76vccg+1rD UgVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuYlEn16N65QFhAWwQ15AdhDISkAQonzS0VcmhxrOLIk5SAgvv YSvNS4FUGjXsi3Ew0dwN4jsI4CRCNhdyxknESxpb9pE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIPR8GqnX8vicUKyTvvUVeNrKwiBWpc0adiw2qgXrDYgjL61C+TUQyice7opEnxlFHqP+CHClwKVbkKYGu+Ks= X-Received: by 2002:a19:6553:: with SMTP id c19mr24805266lfj.158.1574780338762; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:58:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191126135700.743238-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <7ea9d889-c226-68a3-7dfc-3c507eefa53f@tycho.nsa.gov> In-Reply-To: <7ea9d889-c226-68a3-7dfc-3c507eefa53f@tycho.nsa.gov> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:58:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] selinux: cache the SID -> context string translation To: Stephen Smalley , Ondrej Mosnacek , selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Michal Sekletar Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: rcu-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 9:32 AM Stephen Smalley wrote: > Looks good to me and tests passed. I anticipate resolving conflicts > between this and the sidtab reverse lookup hash table being non-trivial > so it will probably require some review when/if Paul merges them both. I haven't yet looked at the latest revision of either patch, but the previous versions looked pretty good (my only comments were rather small, and for the most part everyone else seemed happy as well - minus the small fixes). After I send the merge window PRs off to Linus (tests are passing so that should be today) I'm going to give these a final look and start trying to smoosh them together; I'll probably create a new branch ("next-queue" or something similar) once I'm done where people can review the merge and point out where I messed things up ;) -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com